# Hans de Graaff (2021-07-17)
# Deprecated upstream, replaced with factory_bot.
# Last release in 2017, no dependencies.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-ruby/factory_girl
# Hans de Graaff (2021-07-17)
# Deprecated upstream, no longer needed with rspec 2+
# Last release in 2016, factory_girl
On 2021-07-16 22:50, Sam James wrote:
But to introduce a fix, isn't it a _lot_ easier to do it at the point of a new
EAPI?
In general, IMHO only if we intend to preserve the old (incorrect)
behaviour for older EAPIs - which in this particular case was not needed
because I cannot think of so
On Fri, 2021-07-16 at 20:36 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
> ---
> eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass | 15 ++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass b/eclass/bash-
> completion-r1.eclass
> index 8
> On 14 Jul 2021, at 13:43, Marek Szuba wrote:
>
> On 2021-07-14 13:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't virtual/fortran go into BDEPEND in EAPIs 7 and 8?
>
> Good point! I've created https://bugs.gentoo.org/802153 so that we do not
> lose track of this, that said it is beyond the scope
> On 15 Jul 2021, at 21:41, Marek Szuba wrote:
>
> On 2021-07-15 06:58, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
>> In the latest bunch of updates, we have changed many eclasses to have
>> only a single error case, and also standardized the die message.
>> Maybe simplify this eclass as well?
>
> If anyone fro
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass b/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass
index 80f2d5fcd32a..a9bac0ffae42 100644
--- a/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, Michał Górny wrote:
> case ${EAPI:-0} in
This could be simplified to ${EAPI}.
> - 0|1|2|3|4|5|6|7) ;;
> - *) die "EAPI ${EAPI} unsupported (yet)."
> + 5|6|7|8) ;;
> + *) die "EAPI ${EAPI} unsupported."
> esac
Add the eclass name to the message? Othe
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass | 13 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass b/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass
index 80f2d5fcd32a..7451019931ad 100644
--- a/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass
+++
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 05:33:24PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
> ---
> eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass | 13 +
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass
> b/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass
> ind
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass | 13 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass b/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass
index 80f2d5fcd32a..783ba5a85bd2 100644
--- a/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass
+++
On Fri, 2021-07-16 at 16:21 +0200, David Seifert wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-07-16 at 15:08 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
> > ---
> > eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass | 13 +
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/eclass/bash-c
On Fri, 2021-07-16 at 15:08 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
> ---
> eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass | 13 +
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass b/eclass/bash-
> completion-r1.eclass
> index 80f2
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass | 13 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass b/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass
index 80f2d5fcd32a..58c1debf334e 100644
--- a/eclass/bash-completion-r1.eclass
+++
For FORTRAN_NEEDED=test we need both the compiler and the test binaries
to run on the build host only, hence new EAPIs only set BDEPEND here;
For other modes (other than "no", of course), we need a Fortran compiler
running on the build host as well as the runtime libraries built for the
target arc
With many thanks to ulm for having pointed this out. Not that while this
patch does indeed change the eclass behaviour for the established EAPI 7
rather than for the new EAPI 8, it does so in a way I deem non-intrusive
enough to allow this - the only case where something is actually removed
from DE
15 matches
Mail list logo
