Re: [gentoo-dev] [TINDERBOX] A round with dev-lang/python-exec[-native-symlinks]

2021-01-31 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2021-01-31 at 20:09 +0200, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, T, 29.12.2020 kell 13:33, kirjutas Agostino Sarubbo: > > On martedì 29 dicembre 2020 13:03:07 CET Michał Górny wrote: > > > @ago, could you make sure that the tinderbox tells people to read > > > up > > > on the tracker? >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [TINDERBOX] A round with dev-lang/python-exec[-native-symlinks]

2021-01-31 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 29.12.2020 kell 13:33, kirjutas Agostino Sarubbo: > On martedì 29 dicembre 2020 13:03:07 CET Michał Górny wrote: > > @ago, could you make sure that the tinderbox tells people to read > > up > > on the tracker? > > I added the note. > > However the first thing I would to do i

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving subslot-only virtuals to a separate category to reduce confusion

2021-01-31 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2021, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 18:35 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> To make this SOVERSION-virtual concept more visible and easily >> distinguishable from regular virtuals, I'd like to propose that we >> start >> moving them into a dedicated category.

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] dev-ruby/msgpack: use new extension support

2021-01-31 Thread Hans de Graaff
--- msgpack-1.3.3.ebuild2020-06-13 08:28:00.023541920 +0200 +++ msgpack-1.3.3-r1.ebuild 2021-01-31 09:51:25.856505887 +0100 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -# Copyright 1999-2020 Gentoo Authors +# Copyright 1999-2021 Gentoo Authors # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] ruby-fakegem.eclass: add support for compiled extensions

2021-01-31 Thread Hans de Graaff
Up to now handling of extensions was done in each ebuild that contained them. This means that handling is often inconsistent (e.g. not taking multilib's get_modname into account) and there is a lot of duplicated code in ebuilds. Furthermore, this also does not install extensions into the speci