Ühel kenal päeval, R, 11.09.2020 kell 00:08, kirjutas Jonas Stein:
> Dear all
>
> the following packages are up for grabs after retirement
> of the proxied maintainer:
>
> https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/x11-libs/gdk-pixbuf-loader-webp
>
> The package has open bugs
> https://bugs.gentoo.org
Dear all
the following packages are up for grabs after retirement
of the proxied maintainer:
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/x11-libs/gdk-pixbuf-loader-webp
The package has open bugs
https://bugs.gentoo.org/693062
https://bugs.gentoo.org/703864
--
Best,
Jonas
# Louis Sautier (2020-09-10)
# Masked for removal in 30 days, no revdeps.
# All former consumers now use os.sendfile available in Python >= 3.3.
dev-python/pysendfile
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Mikle Kolyada (2020-09-10)
# Merged into the app-text/texlive-core package.
# Removal in 30 days
dev-tex/dvi2tty
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/eutils.eclass | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/eutils.eclass b/eclass/eutils.eclass
index cd59d3f9ccc4..0a99d00ee01a 100644
--- a/eclass/eutils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/eutils.eclass
@@ -31,9 +31,11 @@ esac
# @FUN
The function is not called from any ebuilds in the gentoo repository.
Inline it as "in_iuse foo && use foo" in other eclasses, or define it
as a local function when it is called multiple times.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/chromium-2.eclass | 4 +--
eclass/eutils.eclass | 3 ++
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/wrapper.eclass | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/wrapper.eclass b/eclass/wrapper.eclass
index 8cde94979d1a..399c7cc269d4 100644
--- a/eclass/wrapper.eclass
+++ b/eclass/wrapper.eclass
@@ -9,8 +9,6 @@
if [[ -z ${_
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/eutils.eclass | 53 ++--
eclass/l10n.eclass | 47 +++
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/eutils.eclass b/eclass/eutils.eclass
index 0072f4ccf3
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/l10n.eclass | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/l10n.eclass b/eclass/l10n.eclass
index 0b2d287afa7f..73d54ec22334 100644
--- a/eclass/l10n.eclass
+++ b/eclass/l10n.eclass
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Copyright 1999-2018 Ge
Proactively deprecate in future EAPIs, as requested by soap.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/eutils.eclass | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/eutils.eclass b/eclass/eutils.eclass
index c2fc05c9dbed..f74074fb4f16 100644
--- a/eclass/euti
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/eutils.eclass | 51 ++--
eclass/wrapper.eclass | 61 +++
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 eclass/wrapper.eclass
diff --git a/eclass/eutils.eclass
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller
---
eclass/edos2unix.eclass | 21 +
eclass/eutils.eclass| 18 +++---
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 eclass/edos2unix.eclass
diff --git a/eclass/edos2unix.eclass b/eclass/edos2unix.eclass
new
In the old times, eutils.eclass used to be inherited by almost all
ebuilds, mainly for the epatch function. Today, this is often no
longer needed since the package manager provides eapply() in EAPI 6
and later.
So, with introduction of EAPI 7, we had already moved most of the
functions in eutils.e
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 8:13 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 07:35 +0200, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 13:35 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> > > Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/741380
> >
> > Could you provide a rationale for removing this? The bug only has a
> > s
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:45 AM Alec Warner wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:59 AM Mikle Kolyada wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10.09.2020 08:35, Hans de Graaff wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 13:35 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
>> >> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/741380
>> > Could you provide a ratio
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:59 AM Mikle Kolyada wrote:
>
> On 10.09.2020 08:35, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 13:35 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> >> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/741380
> > Could you provide a rationale for removing this? The bug only has a
> > single anecdotal
On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 07:35 +0200, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 13:35 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> > Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/741380
>
> Could you provide a rationale for removing this? The bug only has a
> single anecdotal report of a user who can run a desktop without it
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:59:31AM +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
>
> On 10.09.2020 08:35, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 13:35 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> >> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/741380
> > Could you provide a rationale for removing this? The bug only has a
> > single a
On 10.09.2020 08:35, Hans de Graaff wrote:
On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 13:35 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/741380
Could you provide a rationale for removing this? The bug only has a
single anecdotal report of a user who can run a desktop without it. I'm
not sure if tha
19 matches
Mail list logo
