[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/ansimarkup

2020-09-02 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
# Georgy Yakovlev (2020-09-02) # Masked for removal. No revdeps. dev-python/ansimarkup

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please port your packages to Python 3.8

2020-09-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2020-09-02 14:08, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > On Wednesday, 2 September 2020 19:42:33 CEST Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> New USE flags generally change dependencies (as is the case here), so a >> new revision ensures that people are forced to install the ebuild that >> supports python-3.8. Otherw

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please port your packages to Python 3.8

2020-09-02 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Wednesday, 2 September 2020 19:42:33 CEST Michael Orlitzky wrote: > New USE flags generally change dependencies (as is the case here), so a > new revision ensures that people are forced to install the ebuild that > supports python-3.8. Otherwise, you will eventually find a lot of people > stuck

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/pyinsane

2020-09-02 Thread Bernard Cafarelli
# Bernard Cafarelli (2020-09-02) # Abandoned upstream in favor of media-libs/libinsane # No more in-tree users # Removal in 30 days. Bug #740100 dev-python/pyinsane -- Bernard Cafarelli (Voyageur) Gentoo developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please port your packages to Python 3.8

2020-09-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2020-09-02 13:23, Sam James wrote: > > Please request stabilisation of your Python 3.8+ changes at the 30 days > point, or earlier if it’s a trivial revbump > (as new Python targets are equivalent to new USE flags, there is no real need > for a revbump unless doing other tidying > whilst ther

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please port your packages to Python 3.8

2020-09-02 Thread Sam James
> On 1 Sep 2020, at 12:02, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hello, > > [snip] > Python 3.8 is planned to become the default on 2020-12-01. > Note that this means we need to keep in mind stabilisation of Python 3.8+ supporting-packages going forward. Please request stabilisation of your Python 3.8+

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please port your packages to Python 3.8

2020-09-02 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 08:06 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 7:02 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > QA reports provide a list [2] and a graph [3] of packages needing > > porting. > > These lists would be far more useful if they actually listed the > maintainer(s) of each package. The