Re: [gentoo-dev] net-misc/asterisk fails to compile: clang/LLVM: bug 731280

2020-08-27 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:15:47 +0200 Jaco Kroon wrote: > Hi All, > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/731280 > > Summary: > > This machine uses a clang/LLVM toolchain. > Asterisk fails to compile, ./configure fails with: > > checking for RAII support... checking for clang -fblocks... > configure: error:

[gentoo-dev] net-misc/asterisk fails to compile: clang/LLVM: bug 731280

2020-08-27 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi All, https://bugs.gentoo.org/731280 Summary: This machine uses a clang/LLVM toolchain. Asterisk fails to compile, ./configure fails with: checking for RAII support... checking for clang -fblocks... configure: error: BlocksRuntime is required for clang, please install libblocksruntime I susp

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] metadata.xsd: add heptapod to remote-id list

2020-08-27 Thread Azamat H. Hackimov
Heptapod (https://foss.heptapod.net/) is open-source hosting based on GitLab for Mercurial repositories. --- metadata.xsd | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/metadata.xsd b/metadata.xsd index 8b8ac0b..db243ab 100644 --- a/metadata.xsd +++ b/metadata.xsd @@ -272,6 +272,7 @@

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o

2020-08-27 Thread Louis Sautier
On 27/08/2020 12:37, Max Magorsch wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:10 PM Alexis Ballier wrote: >> Any plans on using the remoteid from metadata.xml ? >> It's likely to be much more accurate since people have been filling >> those manually for some time now ;) >> > > I think we could use the re

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o

2020-08-27 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-08-26 20:57, Max Magorsch wrote: > To avoid these false warnings it's now possible to filter the repology > checks. No more false warnings due to Repology not understanding the Gentoo Perl version scheme? Yes please! Thank you *very* much for this feature, and in case I haven't said it ye

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o

2020-08-27 Thread Max Magorsch
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:10 PM Alexis Ballier wrote: > Any plans on using the remoteid from metadata.xml ? > It's likely to be much more accurate since people have been filling > those manually for some time now ;) > I think we could use the remoteid in future to improve the repology warnings.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o

2020-08-27 Thread Max Magorsch
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:00 PM Nils Freydank wrote: > > Hi, > > thanks for the work around p.g.o! I'd directly like to use your opt out for a > package I maintain in proxied mode: > > The following changes since commit b1e0b4c9ec76049631cbb0a2d3798adbce2075ac: > > Ignore net-misc/dropbox::void

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o

2020-08-27 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 18:57 +, Max Magorsch wrote: > Hi all, > > Good news regarding packages.g.o! > > While the new packages.g.o version went into production some time > ago, > this also led to some false warnings about outdated package versions. > This is because we currently take informati

Re: [gentoo-dev] Enable "gui" flag in desktop profile

2020-08-27 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-08-27 11:46, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > IMHO this means that the "gui" flag should be enabled in desktop > profiles (similar to "X"). > > Any comments? If not, I'll enable it in two days from now. Makes sense to me, go ahead. -- MS signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Enable "gui" flag in desktop profile

2020-08-27 Thread David Seifert
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 11:46 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > QA policy says that packages should use the "gui" USE flag for > optional > GUI support: > https://projects.gentoo.org/qa/policy-guide/use-flags.html#pg0802 > > IMHO this means that the "gui" flag should be enabled in desktop > profiles (s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o

2020-08-27 Thread Nils Freydank
Hi, thanks for the work around p.g.o! I'd directly like to use your opt out for a package I maintain in proxied mode: The following changes since commit b1e0b4c9ec76049631cbb0a2d3798adbce2075ac: Ignore net-misc/dropbox::void_x86_64 for repology (2020-08-26 19:14:45 +0200) are available in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-27 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-08-18 14:05, Joonas Niilola wrote: > I'm suggesting of adding a new metadata flag to our Wiki's > User:/Project: page which then prints a message to this page saying > whether the maintainer (be it project or user), "accepts" or "deals > with" Github contributions. The wording can be a bit

[gentoo-dev] Enable "gui" flag in desktop profile

2020-08-27 Thread Ulrich Mueller
QA policy says that packages should use the "gui" USE flag for optional GUI support: https://projects.gentoo.org/qa/policy-guide/use-flags.html#pg0802 IMHO this means that the "gui" flag should be enabled in desktop profiles (similar to "X"). Any comments? If not, I'll enable it in two days from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages are up for grabs: zathura and co

2020-08-27 Thread Piotr Karbowski
On 24/08/2020 13.57, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > dev-libs/girara > app-text/zathura-ps > app-text/zathura-pdf-poppler > app-text/zathura-pdf-mupdf > app-text/zathura-djvu > app-text/zathura-cb > app-text/zathura > > > Are for grabs now, I do not use them daily anymore. A separate active > maintainer n