On 8/8/2020 14:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider on new
> systems from eudev to udev.
>
> This is not a lastrites, and it will not affect current systems since
> they have to migrate manually. Also, this change can be overridden a
William Hubbs writes:
>> William - can you actually elaborate on WHY you want to change things?
>> Is there some problem with eudev? Is it actively maintained and
>> generally tracking upstream udev commits (minus whatever they
>> intentionally don't want to accept)?
>
> It is maintained pri
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2020-08-09 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-tex/cjk-latex20200804-10:02 zlogene 814a4d02b1d
kde-apps/kblog 20200807-18:21 asturm f9300873b60
virtual/wiregu
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 01:22:44PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 06:40:07PM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> > On 2020-08-08 20:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > What do people think?
> >
> > Like others already asked: What's the reason for this?
>
> Like others have said
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 11:22 AM William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 06:40:07PM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> > On 2020-08-08 20:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > What do people think?
> >
> > Like others already asked: What's the reason for this?
>
> Like others have said on the thr
Dear all
the following packages are up for grabs after retirement
of the proxied maintainer:
app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror
This package should really have a maintainer, if it is still used by our
mirrors.
app-misc/screenie
https:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 06:40:07PM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2020-08-08 20:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> > What do people think?
>
> Like others already asked: What's the reason for this?
Like others have said on the thread, the reason for the switch away
from udev in the past was mos
On 2020-08-08 20:51, William Hubbs wrote:
> What do people think?
Like others already asked: What's the reason for this?
What do you expect from this change?
Is there a problem when new Gentoo installations will use EUDEV by
default? Or is there a benefit if new installations would use sys-fs/ud
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 6:57 PM William Hubbs wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> > William - can you actually elaborate on WHY you want to change things?
> > Is there some problem with eudev? Is it actively maintained and
> > generally tracking upstream udev commits (minus whatever they
> > intentionally don
# Michał Górny (2020-08-09)
# Build tool with no revdeps left.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #736517.
dev-python/paver
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello,
I've taken over www-apps/jekyll* for Infra back in the day but I'm no
longer really maintaining it. Two of the packages have another
maintainer but the two listed below are now maintainer-needed:
www-apps/jekyll-coffeescript
www-apps/jekyll-sass-converter
The first one has a test failure
# Michał Górny (2020-08-09)
# Python 2 only. No commits since 2015.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #735334.
dev-vcs/git-bz
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
12 matches
Mail list logo
