Hi fellows,
The following packages are up for grabs:
* dev-util/tup
Two outstanding issues:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711856
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704990
* media-gfx/propaganda
A collection of graphics.
No open bugs. No other package depends on it.
*
# Marek Szuba (2020-07-27)
# No longer available upstream. Potentially copyrighted.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #734116.
app-dicts/sword-Cro
app-dicts/sword-Dan
app-dicts/sword-FarsiOPV
app-dicts/sword-FreLSG
app-dicts/sword-FreMartin
app-dicts/sword-HNV
app-dicts/sword-KJVD
app-dicts/sword-RST
app-
Second iteration of proposed changes to sword-module.eclass, this time
without incrementing revision because I am fairly confident that it
should all be backwards-compatible. Changes with respect to the first
iteration:
- SWORD_MODULE now defaults to a value extracted from PN;
- do not bother wit
1. The old version expected versioned source archives to have been
manually uploaded to the Gentoo mirror network by package
maintainers. This is no longer allowed, or indeed possible for most
Gentoo developers. Instead, use the SRC_URI arrow mechanism to
version archives fetched direct
On 2020-07-27 12:02, Michał Górny wrote:
> +# Note that while all SWORD modules which do not require prior registration
>
> s/which/that/
Not quite sure if this is really necessary, as far as I remember both
"which" and "that" are grammatically correct in this context - in British
English
anyway
On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 11:51 +0200, Marek Szuba wrote:
> On 2020-07-26 21:19, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Please use git-send-email, so that we can reply in context without
> > jumping through hoops.
>
> Funny, last time I used git-send-email to post a diff introducing a new
> revision of a file (it
On 2020-07-26 21:19, Michał Górny wrote:
> Please use git-send-email, so that we can reply in context without
> jumping through hoops.
Funny, last time I used git-send-email to post a diff introducing a new
revision of a file (it was virtual/opencl, IIRC) I got told it was too
difficult to follow
On 7/26/20 12:57 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Even more appropriate would be to enable the flag with an IUSE default.
> The ebuild could still display an ewarn message pointing out the alleged
> security issue.
>
> Ulrich
This'd be nice. A news-worthy update in my opinion regardless.
-- juippis
