On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 18:42 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> TL;DR: What if we launched id.gentoo.org, an identity provider that
> provides authentication for Gentoo properties? Basically, 1 username /
> password for wiki, bugs, email, forums, and any other http service[0][1].
>
> Today Gentoo has nume
On 18-05-2020 18:42:24 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> TL;DR: What if we launched id.gentoo.org[1], an identity provider that
> provides
> authentication for Gentoo properties? Basically, 1 username / password for
> wiki,
> bugs, email, forums, and any other http service[0][1].
I'd be in favour of S
TL;DR: What if we launched id.gentoo.org, an identity provider that
provides authentication for Gentoo properties? Basically, 1 username /
password for wiki, bugs, email, forums, and any other http service[0][1].
Today Gentoo has numerous systems that mostly work in a segmented way.
- To connect
On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 15:02 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 09:42:46PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Why would an ebuild have to check whether the ebuild is live? Isn't it
> > supposed to know that by definition?
>
> See below where I talk about the ebuild version.
>
> >
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 09:42:46PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Why would an ebuild have to check whether the ebuild is live? Isn't it
> supposed to know that by definition?
See below where I talk about the ebuild version.
> > The up side of this would be that we aren't reserving a specific ve
On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 13:35 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I would like to start a discussion on checking the PROPERTIES value in
> ebuilds. Specifically this could be used to check for live ebuilds
> instead of assuming that the version number of an ebuild indicates
> whether the ebuild i
> On Mon, 18 May 2020, William Hubbs wrote:
> I would like to start a discussion on checking the PROPERTIES value in
> ebuilds. Specifically this could be used to check for live ebuilds
> instead of assuming that the version number of an ebuild indicates
> whether the ebuild is live.
> The up
All,
I would like to start a discussion on checking the PROPERTIES value in
ebuilds. Specifically this could be used to check for live ebuilds
instead of assuming that the version number of an ebuild indicates
whether the ebuild is live.
The up side of this would be that we aren't reserving a spe
# Michał Górny (2020-05-18)
# Unmaintained and vulnerable. Last commit in 2013. Stuck on Python 2.
# All reverse dependencies removed restkit support upstream.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #544228.
dev-python/restkit
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
