The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2019-12-08 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
app-admin/certmgr 20191206-19:37 mgorny b3080e09829
app-admin/durep 20191208-19:05 bman 6fc710273d8
app
> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> | We had skipped allocation for 492 and 493, because they're used for
> | oprofile and oidentd in Archlinux, and we have these packages too.
Anyway, stunnel is 341 now, and 492 is (provisionally) reserved
for oprofile.
Ulrich
signature.asc
Des
> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019, Anthony G Basile wrote:
>>> Okay, I'm requesting UID/GID = 492/492. I'm committing in a sec.
>>
>> That's the ID used by arch for oprofile, so it's a bad choice.
> I give up! How am I supposed to know what to choose if it isn't
> requested in the uid-git.txt file?
Be
On 12/8/19 2:59 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019, Anthony G Basile wrote:
>
>> Okay, I'm requesting UID/GID = 492/492. I'm committing in a sec.
>
> That's the ID used by arch for oprofile, so it's a bad choice.
>
> Ulrich
>
I give up! How am I supposed to know what to cho
> On Sun, 08 Dec 2019, Anthony G Basile wrote:
> Okay, I'm requesting UID/GID = 492/492. I'm committing in a sec.
That's the ID used by arch for oprofile, so it's a bad choice.
Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 12/8/19 2:53 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-12-08 at 14:48 -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I know that is my third time requesting a uid/gid for stunnel, but it
>> seems that my previous request was already taken but not added to the
>> uid-gid.txt file, so I didn't
On Sun, 2019-12-08 at 14:48 -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I know that is my third time requesting a uid/gid for stunnel, but it
> seems that my previous request was already taken but not added to the
> uid-gid.txt file, so I didn't know about the collision.
>
> Speaking with
Hi everyone,
I know that is my third time requesting a uid/gid for stunnel, but it
seems that my previous request was already taken but not added to the
uid-gid.txt file, so I didn't know about the collision.
Speaking with mgorny on #gentoo-dev, he suggested that we start simply
making a request,
# David Seifert (2019-12-08)
# Unmaintained, build hangs, tons of other build failures, missing
# dependencies. Bug #663794, #666916, #666922, #667062, #678068,
# #681678, #684420, #694488. Removal in 30 days.
dev-db/clickhouse
# David Seifert (2019-12-08)
# No revdeps, py2 only, needs version bump, practically unmaintained
# in Gentoo. Removal in 30 days.
sci-chemistry/pymol-plugins-psico
On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 21:28 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2019-12-06 21:10, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> > Just so we're on the same page, a recent example of what some
> > people
> > suggesting to keep py27 ad nauseam are asking users to deal with:
> > [...]
> > WARNING: One or more upda
# Michał Górny (2019-12-08)
# Not touched by maintainer since mid-2018. Fails to build with gcc-9.
# Requires llvm:6 (which is being removed). Pending version bump.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #686162.
sys-devel/byfl
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitall
Hey,
On 11/26/19 8:33 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> I am requesting uid and gid 59, both named "unbound", for
> net-dns/unbound.
>
>
59 was already requested for 'tss' few weeks before this mail was sent.
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/d51402450201482f8e3678d2c071b41e
Since 'un
13 matches
Mail list logo
