[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for mail-filter/spamassassin's spamd (337/337)

2019-11-26 Thread Philippe Chaintreuil
Per GLEP-81 I'm submitting a request to assign UID/GID 337 to an spamd user for mail-filter/spamassassin. Github PR: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/13766 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-wireless/bcm43xx-fwcutter

2019-11-26 Thread Jonas Stein
profiles: Mask net-wireless/bcm43xx-fwcutter for removal Mask net-wireless/bcm43xx-fwcutter for removal. Upstream is dead and we have the successor in the tree. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/537786 -- Best regards, Jonas Stein signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC acct-{user,group} for jenkins

2019-11-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2019-11-26 19:43, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> 500...999 is currently marked as "reserved" but this shouldn't block >> this assignment, should it? > > It does. ...could you please explain why? ;) For me, the 500...999 block looks arbitrary. Check Gentoo's /etc/login.defs, 101-999 is valid for us.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC acct-{user,group} for jenkins

2019-11-26 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2019, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > 500...999 is currently marked as "reserved" but this shouldn't block > this assignment, should it? It does. > Therefore I am requesting uid and gid 818, both named "jenkins", for > dev-util/jenkins-bin. signature.asc Description: PGP signa

[gentoo-dev] RFC acct-{user,group} for unbound

2019-11-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
I am requesting uid and gid 59, both named "unbound", for net-dns/unbound. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC acct-{user,group} for collectd

2019-11-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
I am requesting uid and gid 440, both named "collectd", for app-metrics/collectd. -- Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] RFC acct-{user,group} for jenkins

2019-11-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
No distribution I checked (Arch, Debian, Fedora/RH) has a static UID/GID for dev-util/jenkins-bin. Upstream failed multiple times with chosen UID/GID in documentation: https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/issues/112 https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/pull/153 https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/is

[gentoo-dev] RFC acct-{user,group} for nginx

2019-11-26 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Most distributions are using www-data user and are sharing user between www-servers packages. However, Gentoo, for historical reason(?) is using apache for www-servers/apache and nginx for www-servers/nginx. Therefore I am requesting uid and gid 82, both named "nginx", for www-servers/nginx. --

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-python/setuptools deps in distutils-r1 packages

2019-11-26 Thread Jason Zaman
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 04:29:28PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 21:30 +0800, Jason Zaman wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 06:38:47PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > TL;DR: should we depend on setuptools by default? Alternatively, should > > > we add distut

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-python/setuptools deps in distutils-r1 packages

2019-11-26 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 21:30 +0800, Jason Zaman wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 06:38:47PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > > > TL;DR: should we depend on setuptools by default? Alternatively, should > > we add distutils_enable_setuptools API to provide at least partial > > validity checks.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-python/setuptools deps in distutils-r1 packages

2019-11-26 Thread Jason Zaman
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 06:38:47PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > TL;DR: should we depend on setuptools by default? Alternatively, should > we add distutils_enable_setuptools API to provide at least partial > validity checks. > > > Variant 1: automatic dependency on setuptools > =

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emacs/elib

2019-11-26 Thread Ulrich Mueller
# Ulrich Müller (2019-11-26) # Upstream says: "Elib has been decommissioned as a separate package # since its useful functions have long since been included in Emacs." # Last release in 1995. Byte-compilation fails with Emacs 27. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #701160. app-emacs/elib signa