Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing

2019-09-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Jason Zaman wrote: > The "GPL-2.0" one is deprecated: > https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html > If SPDX moved to having two names "-only" and "-or-later" then we > should too. The main problem is that we will always have licenses that are not in their list. So if they

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing

2019-09-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 4:46 PM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > On Sun, 22 Sep 2019, Matt Turner wrote: > > > An idea to consider: use SPDX license identifiers (see > > https://spdx.org/licenses/) > > > For GPL 2 they are "GPL-2.0-only" and "GPL-2.0-or-later" > > Yeah, they have a history of using

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing

2019-09-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:42 PM Jason Zaman wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:17:53PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having > > > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing

2019-09-23 Thread Jason Zaman
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:17:53PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Michał Górny wrote: > > > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having > > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev to double-check if it's > > 'GPL-2-only' or 'GPL-2+'. > > This

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] go-module-vendor.eclass: new eclass for go modules that do not vendor

2019-09-23 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 06:36:49PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > This eclass adds a src_unpack function that supports the EGO_VENDOR > variable for vendoring modules. > --- > eclass/go-module-vendor.eclass | 124 + > 1 file changed, 124 insertions(+) > create mode

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] go-module-vendor.eclass: new eclass for go modules that do not vendor

2019-09-23 Thread William Hubbs
This eclass adds a src_unpack function that supports the EGO_VENDOR variable for vendoring modules. --- eclass/go-module-vendor.eclass | 124 + 1 file changed, 124 insertions(+) create mode 100644 eclass/go-module-vendor.eclass diff --git a/eclass/go-module-vendor

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] introduce new eclasses to handle go modules (round 2)

2019-09-23 Thread William Hubbs
*** BLURB HERE *** All, This is my second iteration of the split eclasses I am working on for Go modules. There was no feedback on go-module.eclass from the last thread, so it hasn't been changed. Patch 2 encorporates the changes to go-module-vendor.eclass suggested in the last thread. Thanks,

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] go-module.eclass: new eclass for go modules

2019-09-23 Thread William Hubbs
This eclass includes the basic settings and a pkg_postinst function for go modules. Signed-off-by: William Hubbs --- eclass/go-module.eclass | 79 + 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+) create mode 100644 eclass/go-module.eclass diff --git a/eclass/go-module

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-libs/libwbxml

2019-09-23 Thread Bernard Cafarelli
Le Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:48:24 +0200 Michał Górny a écrit: > # Michał Górny (2019-09-12) > # Unmaintained. Last bumped in 2014. Homepage gone. No reverse > # dependencies. > # Removal in 30 days. Bug #694210. > dev-libs/libwbxml This is actually a dependency for gnustep-apps/sogo (fixing the m

[gentoo-dev] RFC: GID/UID assignment for OpenDKIM (334)

2019-09-23 Thread Ralph Seichter
I'd like to reserve GID/UID 334 for mail-filter/opendkim (see QA bug #694638). Arch and Fedora apparently don't have reserved IDs for OpenDKIM, and 334 is unclaimed in Gentoo. -Ralph