On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 03:09:20PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, Aaron Bauman wrote:
>
> > Following the feedback so far, here is v2 of the news item. [...]
>
> Sorry, looks like I replied to v1 when v2 was already out.
>
> The following still applies, though:
>
> >
On 19-02-23 08:17:18, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 20:58 -0600, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > On 19-02-19 22:05:02, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:03:51 -0600
> > > Matthew Thode wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 19-02-20 00:00:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > > > > On 2/19/19 11
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> Following the feedback so far, here is v2 of the news item. [...]
Sorry, looks like I replied to v1 when v2 was already out.
The following still applies, though:
> Migration from both 13.0 and 17.0 profiles are supported. In case
s/are/is/ (Sub
В Пн, 25/02/2019 в 13:07 +0300, Alexander Tsoy пишет:
> В Чт, 21/02/2019 в 04:36 -0500, Joshua Kinard пишет:
> > Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up
> > significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my
> > x86_64
> > box shows no discernible change in
В Чт, 21/02/2019 в 04:36 -0500, Joshua Kinard пишет:
> Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up
> significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my
> x86_64
> box shows no discernible change in build times between the same
> versions.
> Can any other archs
Hi!
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> On Thursday, February 21, 2019 1:36:24 AM PST Joshua Kinard wrote:
> > Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up
> > significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my x86_64
> > box shows no discernible cha
