20181211-13:39 mgornyb70f53f9b96
dev-python/aldryn-bootstrap3 20181216-15:52 mgorny77106f3e636
dev-python/aldryn-search 20181216-15:52 mgorny0ebc940991e
dev-python/django-classy-tags20181216-15:53 mgornya406705ae6c
dev-python/django-cms
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:04:22 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> According to Nvidia these are former "Short Lived" branches that are
> no longer supported.
>
>
> # Jeroen Roovers (14 Dec 2018)
> # Deprecated short lived branches
> # https://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html
> # File a bug report if y
On Sunday, December 16, 2018 2:18:33 PM PST Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 12/15/18 3:00 AM, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> > that should be enough to provide a bit more to initial information without
> > going crazy and clobbering output too much.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> At least for the tinderbox image iss
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 14:45:11 -0500
Matt Turner wrote:
> I guess my question to you is whether you think it's okay to mask -304
> for removal or whether there are enough users that we should keep it
> under package.mask?
"The Linux 304.* legacy driver series is the last to support the NV4x
and G7
On 12/15/18 3:00 AM, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> that should be enough to provide a bit more to initial information without
> going crazy and clobbering output too much.
>
> Thoughts?
At least for the tinderbox image issues I was asked by devs in the past to
include bits for the following software
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 20:41:49 +0100
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> No, 390.87 is the latest for your chip and is not masked for removal.
>
> The 396 branch has seen no updates since 10 April 2018 while the 390
> branch was last updated on 27 August 2018. Higher major versions do not
> mean you have some
On Saturday, December 15, 2018 3:57:02 AM PST Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> On 15.12.2018 5:00, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while lurking on bugzilla lately I noticed that package part of
> > "emerge --info" output may be lacking in some cases.
> >
> > Good candidates for adding to that file
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 23:12:55 +0200
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > It's bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/669588
>
> That bug should have remained open until cleanup is concluded, afaik.
> Could also change whiteboard to s/stable/cleanup/ (I was about to
> reopen and do that, but bugzilla suddenly had me
Ühel kenal päeval, P, 16.12.2018 kell 14:45, kirjutas Matt Turner:
> > > It still requires xorg-server-1.19 which I'd like to drop due to
> > > a
> > > security vulnerability. After the listed versions are gone, -304
> > > will
> > > be the only thing keeping 1.19 in tree.
>
> It's bug https://bug
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:25:04 +
Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> Tl;DR: 13.0 profiles will be removed some time soon unless there are
> enough reports broken on 13.0->17.0 switch.
>
> 13.0 profiles been a while in Gentoo tree and are already deprecated
> on some arches but not everywhere.
>
> If
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 2:40 PM Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:03:52 -0800
> Matt Turner wrote:
>
> > Thanks. What do we want to do about -304?
>
> It's not on the list above because it's a "legacy driver", not a
> "short lived" branch[1]. It's not relevant in this context what
(Re-sending using the proper e-mail address)
On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 21:53:03 +1300
Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:04:22 +0100
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> > According to Nvidia these are former "Short Lived" branches that
> > are no longer supported.
> >
> >
> > # Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:03:52 -0800
Matt Turner wrote:
> Thanks. What do we want to do about -304?
It's not on the list above because it's a "legacy driver", not a
"short lived" branch[1]. It's not relevant in this context what happens
to the 304 branch, the context being a cleanup of intermediat
13 matches
Mail list logo
