Hi,
I'd like to propose adding the following global USE flag:
zip - Enable support for .zip archives
The following packages match this description rather exactly:
local:zip:app-text/glark: Support for ZIP files using dev-ruby/rubyzip
local:zip:dev-games/cegui: Enable the Minizip resource pr
On 11.10.2018 18:10, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> Let me quote
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=f6f6bb91b7f134a121ef9fa1dd504b9ca52c5aa8:
>
>> net-dns/dnssec-root: Blind stable on arm, critical bug 667774
>>
>> Note that this is a major fail for a stable architecture.
>> In
# Virgil Dupras (12 Oct 2018)
# Unmaintained, no revdep. Removal in 30 days. Bug #645384
dev-python/jenkinsapi
pgpHv99GpiQ5m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 1:14 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> But that's not the point here. The point was to get some attention that
> again we have a lacking architecture (net-dns/dnssec-root is not the
> only package where ARM arch team is lacking behind) which affects anyone
> "trusting" someh
# Virgil Dupras (12 Oct 2018)
# Dead upstream, unmaintained, no revdep. Removal in 30 days.
# Bug #285169
dev-python/twill
dev-python/flask-testing
pgpPN3DapwaK8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:14:00 +0200
Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> > 1) Someone blind-stabled something on arm and it broke (doesn't
> > build?) 2) The arm team failed to mark a package stable before a
> > hard deadline (DNSSEC key rotation)
"Blind-stabled"...
> But that's not the point here. The p
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 02:40:38 +0200
Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2018-10-12 01:38, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> >> Maybe it is time to destabilize ARM on Gentoo to stop the impression
> >> that we really support ARM.
> >
> > [ CC: arm@ ]
> >
> > A few points to think about:
> >
> > 1. I have
