Hi,
> Since with EAPI 7 support for cross-compilation became something more
> official, I've created cross@ alias on woodpecker. The idea is to have
> something like prefix@ -- when people report that stuff doesn't cross
> compile right and you can't help them, you assign it to cross@ and hope
>
On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 20:29 +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2018 20:26:23 CEST Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > Has anyone said why these things need to be in ${PN}-${PV} rather than
> > ${PF}?
>
> Because API does not change due to Gentoo revisions, and breaking/having to
On Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2018 20:26:23 CEST Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Has anyone said why these things need to be in ${PN}-${PV} rather than
> ${PF}?
Because API does not change due to Gentoo revisions, and breaking/having to
rebuild docs for that is unacceptable.
It will lead to more docs being
On 10/03/2018 12:38 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>
> Until this QA check has adjustable whitelist support, we can consider it
> an unstable work in progress.
Has anyone said why these things need to be in ${PN}-${PV} rather than
${PF}?
If they don't need to be in ${PN}-${PV} in the first place, then th
On 10/01/2018 11:23 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/01/2018 11:16 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 19:23 +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
>>> On Montag, 1. Oktober 2018 17:48:16 CEST Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 08:19 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> /usr/share/doc l
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 10:14 PM Marty E. Plummer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 10:08:03AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:17 AM James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 09:00:38 -0400
> > > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > >
> > > > > The reason why it is in DEPE
Avoid calling binaries that may have been compiled against different
libraries or even cross-compiled for an incomatible arch.
Also drop the related eclass variables: these are currently unused by
any ebuild.
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert
---
eclass/xdg-utils.eclass | 28 ++---
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:23 AM James Le Cuirot wrote:
>
> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 09:33:53 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 22:16 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > Avoid calling binaries that may have been compiled against different
> > > libraries or even cross-compiled for an
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 09:33:53 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 22:16 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > Avoid calling binaries that may have been compiled against different
> > libraries or even cross-compiled for an incomatible arch.
> >
> > Instead, always call the binaries install
On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 22:16 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Avoid calling binaries that may have been compiled against different
> libraries or even cross-compiled for an incomatible arch.
>
> Instead, always call the binaries installed in BROOT (/), if available.
Except BROOT doesn't have to be / (
On Mittwoch, 3. Oktober 2018 04:22:14 CEST Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Or maybe start with a github pull request and we can work out the
> kinks there. Whichever you prefer.
PR exists already: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/9059
11 matches
Mail list logo
