[gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly x11@ project status for April 2018

2018-04-01 Thread Duncan
Matt Turner posted on Sun, 01 Apr 2018 20:08:35 -0700 as excerpted: > My list of to-do items consists of: > > == Fix x11-base/xorg-server suid/systemd situation == > https://bugs.gentoo.org/635102 > > Under some circumstances (kernel modesetting driver + systemd, I think) > Xorg should be able t

[gentoo-dev] Monthly mips@ project status for April 2018

2018-04-01 Thread Matt Turner
I'd like to start giving ~monthly updates on the status of mips@ in Gentoo. Recently I received a Loongson 3A system (quad-core 1.35GHz, 16GB RAM, AMD graphics) which is significantly faster and more stable than any other mips system I have. mips@ is currently assigned or cc'd on 29 bugs. This n

[gentoo-dev] Monthly x11@ project status for April 2018

2018-04-01 Thread Matt Turner
I'd like to start giving ~monthly updates on the status of x11@ packages in Gentoo. I hope it gives some insight into the status of a rather important set of packages and maybe encourages others to lend a hand to a very understaffed project when possible. I expect future reports to be significant

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2018-04-01 23:59 UTC

2018-04-01 Thread Robin H. Johnson
williamh f3ed20bf98a net-libs/srt 20180322-16:45 lu_zero aeccfd18102 net-misc/casync20180326-14:45 mrueg eb6b676bea2 sys-apps/smcipmitool 20180329-14:40 mgornyffa696581eb sys-cluster/pmix 20180401-20:43

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-office/mdbtools

2018-04-01 Thread Jonas Stein
Dear all, The following packages are up for grabs: app-office/mdbtools after retirement of the proxied maintainer. https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-office/mdbtools "Set of libraries and utilities for reading Microsoft Access database (MDB) files" Todo: HOMEPAGE links to SF, but we dist

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: empty directories in ${D}

2018-04-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:46:56 +0100 Andrey Utkin wrote: > Right, I am not aware why PMS has left this explicitly undefined. Because when we wrote the spec, Portage's actual behaviour on empty directories was extremely tricky to define and depended upon things like whether you were upgrading or rei