On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 09:32:32PM -0500, Brian Evans wrote:
> I have a plan I would like some eyes on...
>
> I want to gradually *BAN* the use of virtual/mysql and
> virtual/libmysqlclient as dependencies.
Overall I agree, but there's some slight concerns I have.
> To accomplish this, force dev-
I have a plan I would like some eyes on...
I want to gradually *BAN* the use of virtual/mysql and
virtual/libmysqlclient as dependencies.
To accomplish this, force dev-db/mysql-connector-c to be the only souce
of libmysqlclient.so.
Packages that choose to support libmariadb.so instead can inclu
William Hubbs wrote:
> The first change is that ROOTPATH is no longer set. This means all of
> the *sbin directories will be added to the default path for all users
> instead of just the root user.
Maybe add a sentence about why this is changing or even neccessary,
to avoid perception of weakened
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> [about QA's role]
Sorry, I didn't spend attention to the fact that the message I was
replying to was in the wrong list. Please continue in gentoo-project
where this thread belongs.
pgp8a3bnmBxzU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Dean Stephens schrieb:
>>> QA and Comrel are special in that they can take disciplinary
>>> action against non-members, which there is no recourse against
>>> except appeal to the Council.
>>>
>> At the very least: QA, Comrel, IRC o
Hello everyone,
Gentoo has been accepted into the Google Summer of Code 2018!
Mentors:
If you want to mentor some projects on Gentoo GSoC 2018 please add
yourself here [1] as soon as possible, is important!.
Someone from the Gentoo GSoC team will contact you back, as soon as possible.
Students:
On 13/02/18 20:57, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> wrote:
>> Dean Stephens schrieb:
>>
Suppose that the council decides to accept an appeal from comrel. Is it
a conflict of interest for a member of the council who is also a member
>>>
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> Dean Stephens schrieb:
>
>>> Suppose that the council decides to accept an appeal from comrel. Is it
>>> a conflict of interest for a member of the council who is also a member
>>> of comrel to vote in the appeal? If it isn't,
Ulrich Mueller schrieb:
> Don't vote for that person then? Why would we need a general rule
> restricting voters from electing any specific candidate?
For the same reason why governing bodies sometimes restrict accumulation of
mandates (and have term limits etc.). Of course the electorate can jus
Dean Stephens schrieb:
>> Suppose that the council decides to accept an appeal from comrel. Is it
>> a conflict of interest for a member of the council who is also a member
>> of comrel to vote in the appeal? If it isn't, it is at least a pretty
>> strong perception that it is.
>>
> Why? How? Exac
Dean Stephens schrieb:
>> QA and Comrel are special in that they can take disciplinary action against
>> non-members, which there is no recourse against except appeal to the Council.
>>
> At the very least: QA, Comrel, IRC ops (in every project specific
> channel), planet/universe, forums, and wiki
Michael Lienhardt wrote:
> the criteria list you gave (maybe it's in the PMS)
I doubt that it is in PMS, and IMHO it also does not belong there:
As long as the result configuration is valid (no collisions
or unresolvable loops) all should be equally fine from the
viewpoint of PMS: It is in the re
Thanks a lot for this list!
You are totally right, simply translating the dependencies into SAT constraints
and feeding them to a solver returns in most cases a very bad, totally useless
solution.
However, nowadays many solvers support solution optimization, i.e., you can
specify an ordered li
On 02/13/2018 11:47 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 08:59 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> # Kristian Fiskerstrand (11 Feb 2018)
>> # Lastrite: app-crypt/monkeysign . Please use caff from
>> # app-crypt/signing-party instead. Removal in 30 days.
>> # Bug: #647352
>> app-crypt/monkey
Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> d. In || ( ... ) clauses the left-most packages should be preserved.
s/preserved/preferred/
> you've missed the most important point: we want to prefer
> the newest version, whenever possible
> ;-).
Yes, you are right: I had thought only about packages, not about vers
On 13/02/18 10:47, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 08:59 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> # Kristian Fiskerstrand (11 Feb 2018)
>> # Lastrite: app-crypt/monkeysign . Please use caff from
>> # app-crypt/signing-party instead. Removal in 30 days.
>> # Bug: #647352
>> app-crypt/monkeysign
On 02/12/2018 08:59 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> # Kristian Fiskerstrand (11 Feb 2018)
> # Lastrite: app-crypt/monkeysign . Please use caff from
> # app-crypt/signing-party instead. Removal in 30 days.
> # Bug: #647352
> app-crypt/monkeysign
>
What's the reason for the removal?
W dniu wto, 13.02.2018 o godzinie 07∶49 +, użytkownik Martin Vaeth
napisał:
> Michael Lienhardt wrote:
> >
> > ad-hoc fixes and tweaks that can hardly be encoded into SAT constraints.
>
> The main difficulty which I see is that one does not want only _some_
> solution, but among all solution
18 matches
Mail list logo
