[gentoo-dev] Last rites: ruby22-only packages and slots

# Hans de Graaff (24 Jan 2018) # Remove packages that are ruby22-only, and either cannot # be updated to ruby23, or are in old, obsolete, slots. # Masked for removal in 30 days. dev-ruby/amq-protocol:0 dev-ruby/aws-sdk:0 dev-ruby/bson:3 dev-ruby/camping dev-ruby/execjs:1 dev-ruby/mocha:0.11 dev-ru

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps

On 01/22/2018 02:28 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Montag, 22. Januar 2018, 08:01:08 CET schrieb Zac Medico: >> >> According to Gentoo policy, future ebuild dependency changes need to be >> accompanied by a revision bump in order to trigger rebuilds for users. >> Therefore, you should only need

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps

On 01/22/2018 01:38 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:01 AM, Zac Medico > wrote: > > According to Gentoo policy, future ebuild dependency changes need to be > accompanied by a revision bump in order to trigger rebuilds for users. > There

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps

On 01/22/2018 12:24 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:01:08 -0800 > Zac Medico wrote: > >> Please review. >> >> Title: Portage Dynamic Deps >> Author: Zac Medico >> Posted: 2018-01-28 >> Revision: 1 >> News-Item-Format: 2.0 >> Display-If-Installed: > >> Beginning with Portage 2.

[gentoo-dev] Re: News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps

> On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Martin Vaeth wrote: > Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> "Runtime dependencies (RDEPEND). These must be installed and usable >> before the results of an ebuild merging are treated as usable." >> https://projects.gentoo.org/pms/6/pms.html#x1-770008.1 >> >> IMHO this implies that

[gentoo-dev] Re: News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps

Ulrich Mueller wrote: > This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) > --pgp+signed++Zg8D+I6sgRUw0D > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >> On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Martin Vaeth wrote: > >> Rich Freeman wrote: >>> >>> It would already be

[gentoo-dev] Re: News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps

> On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Martin Vaeth wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> It would already be broken on any PMS-compliant package manager > No, it is solely the interpretation of the package manager. > PMS does not specify what information is stored in /var/db > or how that information is used

[gentoo-dev] Re: News Item: Portage Dynamic Deps

Rich Freeman wrote: > > It would already be broken on any PMS-compliant package manager No, it is solely the interpretation of the package manager. PMS does not specify what information is stored in /var/db or how that information is used.