Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ${PYTHON_COMPAT_ADD} in addition to ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE}

2018-01-15 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu pon, 15.01.2018 o godzinie 16∶27 +0100, użytkownik Francesco Riosa napisał: > In late 2015 ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE} has been standardized and added > to all python eclasses, it's useful for developers that want test and > mark the package for newer versions of python. > > However (unless I

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] introduce Prefix 17.0 profiles.

2018-01-15 Thread Benda Xu
Hi, R0b0t1 writes: > I have seen similar choices made before, but this is the first time I > have seen a good case for the choice you selected. E.g.: > > (Current.) > *> >*=> > *==> > *===>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] introduce Prefix 17.0 profiles.

2018-01-15 Thread R0b0t1
Erm. On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:23 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > Hello, and my apologies for missing your message. > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Benda Xu wrote: >> Hi R0b0t1, >> >> R0b0t1 writes: >> >>> I don't want to just comment on naming, but: >>> >>> It might be more natural to go the other w

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] introduce Prefix 17.0 profiles.

2018-01-15 Thread R0b0t1
Hello, and my apologies for missing your message. On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Benda Xu wrote: > Hi R0b0t1, > > R0b0t1 writes: > >> I don't want to just comment on naming, but: >> >> It might be more natural to go the other way. Split profiles off based >> on version when breakage occurs, an

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Personal Gentoo Installer project pre-alpha release

2018-01-15 Thread Christopher Díaz Riveros
El lun, 15-01-2018 a las 18:18 +, Robin H. Johnson escribió: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 01:01:59PM -0600, Matthew Thode wrote: > > On 18-01-14 13:57:56, Christopher Díaz Riveros wrote: > > > Good day devs, and users: > > > > > > generate: produces a stageX tarball. StageX contains some of

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ${PYTHON_COMPAT_ADD} in addition to ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE}

2018-01-15 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 7:05 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote: > > > On 15/01/2018 18:07, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Francesco Riosa > wrote: > >> In late 2015 ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE} has been standardized and added > >> to all python eclasses, it's useful for developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ${PYTHON_COMPAT_ADD} in addition to ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE}

2018-01-15 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 15/01/2018 18:07, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote: >> In late 2015 ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE} has been standardized and added >> to all python eclasses, it's useful for developers that want test and >> mark the package for newer versions of python.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] linux-mod.eclass: IUSE default support for MODULES_OPTIONAL_USE

2018-01-15 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 02:26:19PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:34:12PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 01/14/2018 06:53 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: MODULES_OPTIONAL_USE_IUSE_DEFAULT > > > +# @DESCRIPTION: > > > +# A boolean to control th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list

2018-01-15 Thread Gordon Pettey
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Tom H wrote: >> >> Gentoo's singling itself itself out as less receptive to its users >> simply because some its developers are too Trumpian to resist arguing >> with people who criticize their work or Gentoo.

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering

2018-01-15 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, everyone. Just a quick idea of reordering / regrouping the arch list on Bugzilla. Currently the list is split into 'stable' and 'unstable' arches which is not very precise, and do not exactly match what arch teams are doing. For that reason, I'd like to use three groups instead: a. stable ar

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] linux-mod.eclass: IUSE default support for MODULES_OPTIONAL_USE

2018-01-15 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 01:34:12PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/14/2018 06:53 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: MODULES_OPTIONAL_USE_IUSE_DEFAULT > > +# @DESCRIPTION: > > +# A boolean to control the IUSE default state for the MODULES_OPTIONAL_USE > > USE > > +# flag. D

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] linux-mod.eclass: IUSE default support for MODULES_OPTIONAL_USE

2018-01-15 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/14/2018 06:53 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: MODULES_OPTIONAL_USE_IUSE_DEFAULT > +# @DESCRIPTION: > +# A boolean to control the IUSE default state for the MODULES_OPTIONAL_USE > USE > +# flag. Default value is unset (false). True represented by 1 or 'on', other > +# value

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Personal Gentoo Installer project pre-alpha release

2018-01-15 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 01:01:59PM -0600, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 18-01-14 13:57:56, Christopher Díaz Riveros wrote: > > Good day devs, and users: > > > > generate: produces a stageX tarball. StageX contains some of > > the needed files to install and configure Gentoo linux,

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ${PYTHON_COMPAT_ADD} in addition to ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE}

2018-01-15 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote: > > In late 2015 ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE} has been standardized and added > to all python eclasses, it's useful for developers that want test and > mark the package for newer versions of python. > > However (unless I'm missing something) PY

[gentoo-dev] RFC: ${PYTHON_COMPAT_ADD} in addition to ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE}

2018-01-15 Thread Francesco Riosa
In late 2015 ${PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE} has been standardized and added to all python eclasses, it's useful for developers that want test and mark the package for newer versions of python. However (unless I'm missing something) PYTHON_COMPAT_OVERRIDE is not usable if: - the user want only python 2

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list

2018-01-15 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Tom H wrote: > > Gentoo's singling itself itself out as less receptive to its users > simply because some its developers are too Trumpian to resist arguing > with people who criticize their work or Gentoo. > Wouldn't it be a bit exclusionary to require prospective

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list

2018-01-15 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:57 AM, David Seifert wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 08:55 +0100, Lars Wendler wrote: >> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:56 +0300 Eray Aslan wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:20:56PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: * Posting to the list will only be possible to Ge