profiles: Last rite app-doc/linux-gazette
Upstream deleted all files more than 6 years ago and is inactive.
Masked for removal on 2018-02-01
app-doc/linux-gazette-base
app-doc/linux-gazette-all
app-doc/linux-gazette
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/628960
--
Best regards,
Jonas Stein
signature.
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2017, 22:33:03 CET schrieb R0b0t1:
>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> > As he said, he contactedd the maintainers in ample time, so I would say
>> > that since they didn't respond he went a
Am Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2017, 22:33:03 CET schrieb R0b0t1:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > As he said, he contactedd the maintainers in ample time, so I would say
> > that since they didn't respond he went ahead in good faith. I'll get the
> > link later, but as I re
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> As he said, he contactedd the maintainers in ample time, so I would say
> that since they didn't respond he went ahead in good faith. I'll get the
> link later, but as I recall, the dev manual recommends a 2-4 week wait
> for maintainers not
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 05:18:11PM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
>
>
> On 12/27/17 16:47, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Robin H. Johnson
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 11:22:50PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> >>> You might want to mention that alternativ
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 05:42:04PM +0200, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On K, 2017-12-27 at 09:57 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > > 2) What you plan to do to have USE=cracklib enabled by default. Two
> > > people suggested you should keep this (one way or another) but
> > instead
> > > everyone is now
On 12/27/2017 10:42 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> If you want to make such a base profile change, then I believe you
> should contact the maintainers and see which one wants it default
> disabled, and which default enabled; do the default enabled changes
> and only afterwards you can touch a base defa
On 12/27/17 16:47, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 11:22:50PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>>> You might want to mention that alternatively, uninstalling
>>> openrc&sysvinit&netifrc on a systemd profile system is fine
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> You might want to mention that alternatively, uninstalling
> openrc&sysvinit&netifrc on a systemd profile system is fine to do
> these days, despite the warning.
I have added the following text after the third paragraph. Let me know
if
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 11:22:50PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> You might want to mention that alternatively, uninstalling
>> openrc&sysvinit&netifrc on a systemd profile system is fine to do
>> these days, despite the warning.
> If
On K, 2017-12-27 at 10:31 -0500, Brian Evans wrote:
> >
> > # Pacho Ramos (27 Dec 2017)
> > # All Ekiga set is dead and broken for years, it relies on obsolete
> > # dead/libs that are also old and broken and upstream looks to not
> > release
> > # newer ekiga ever. To keep this please go ahead a
On K, 2017-12-27 at 09:57 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > 2) What you plan to do to have USE=cracklib enabled by default. Two
> > people suggested you should keep this (one way or another) but
> instead
> > everyone is now without it enabled by default.
>
> I plan to do nothing, because I think
> # Pacho Ramos (27 Dec 2017)
> # All Ekiga set is dead and broken for years, it relies on obsolete
> # dead/libs that are also old and broken and upstream looks to not release
> # newer ekiga ever. To keep this please go ahead and take care of it *and
> # all the dependencies it also needs*. See
On 12/27/2017 05:49 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> OK, let me explain again.
>
> In #gentoo we give a lot of attention and support to people who want to
> set up full disk encryption, tor, VPNs, and other security mechanisms,
> and this tells me that they actually want security. By saying that "some
# Pacho Ramos (27 Dec 2017)
# Remove all Compiz related packages: they all need major work/bumps to fix
# lots of pending issues and they need a dedicated maintainer (bug #339622
# and many others). Removal in a month.
x11-wm/compiz
x11-apps/fusion-icon
x11-libs/compizconfig-backend-gconf
x11-libs
# Pacho Ramos (27 Dec 2017)
# Dead for ages, not needed, for java 1.5 (#638036). Removal in a month.
dev-java/jikes
# Pacho Ramos (27 Dec 2017)
# Dead for ages, requires glibc with rpc (#371391). Removal in a month.
net-misc/netkit-rusers
# Pacho Ramos (27 Dec 2017)
# Out ebuild is completely
On Fri, 22 Dec 2017 12:30:35 -0500
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/21/2017 02:27 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:10:30 -0500
> > Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >
> >> The "cracklib" USE flag ... this commit removes it from
> >> base/make.defaults.
> >>
> >> Closes: https://bug
17 matches
Mail list logo
