Am Mittwoch, 1. November 2017, 09:44:09 CET schrieb Michał Górny:
> Hi,
>
> Ok, so before we get into this deeper, here's another option we've been
> discussing. Let's drop the non-strict mode entirely, drop OPTIONAL
> and keep MISC as deprecated-used-to-have-special-meaning alias to DATA.
>
> Th
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:44:09AM +0100, Micha?? Górny wrote
> All that said, if we really have a problem that needs solving here, I'm
> not convinced MISC is the right solution for it. If people need to
> explicitly exclude stuff, then I suppose the configuration-injected
> ignore list is much b
Hi,
Ok, so before we get into this deeper, here's another option we've been
discussing. Let's drop the non-strict mode entirely, drop OPTIONAL
and keep MISC as deprecated-used-to-have-special-meaning alias to DATA.
This is going to make a lot of things simpler, and avoid having the very
long disc
