On 25/10/2017 14:32, Hanno Böck wrote:
> Good security includes reducing complexity. Tough (as evident by this
> thread) it's a thought many people find hard to accept.
>
> This thread is going into a completely different direction and I find
> that worriesome. We have two non-problems ("what if se
Here's v2.0.1 with suggestions from mjo applied.
ReST: https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/glep-0065.rst
HTML: https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/glep-0065.html
---
GLEP: 65
Title: Post-install QA checks
Author: Michał Górny
Type: Standards Track
Status: Draft
Version: 2
Created: 2014-10-26
Last-
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 02:40:58 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> At that point, and this is a serious proposal:
> The package manager shall decide which hashes to check, but is
> required to check at least one hash. The choice may be 'fastest',
> 'most secure', or any local factor.
Sorry to c
On 10/25/2017 03:18 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> ...
>>> The QA checks can inspect the installation image or live system
>>> respectively,
>>
>> Respective to what?
>
> To the type of check, as explained later? If you want to help, then
> please be specific instead of asking questions and expectin
W dniu wto, 24.10.2017 o godzinie 17∶57 -0400, użytkownik Michael
Orlitzky napisał:
> On 10/17/2017 02:12 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> >
> > ...
> > The QA checks can inspect the installation image or live system
> > respectively,
>
> Respective to what?
To the type
