W dniu czw, 07.09.2017 o godzinie 17∶56 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman
napisał:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > W dniu czw, 07.09.2017 o godzinie 16∶42 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman
> > napisał:
> > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > W dniu cz
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:56:32 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> And how would I figure it out, considering that simply asking on the
> list doesn't seem to yield a straight answer? Do you really need me
> to put it on the Council agenda? Or do we unmask it, let QA mask it
> 10 minutes later, then go ba
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
Do we routinely confirm that any site we list in SRC_URI has
permission to redistribute files? That seems like a slippery
slope.
>>>
>>> We don't, and for a package that co
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu czw, 07.09.2017 o godzinie 16∶42 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman
> napisał:
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > W dniu czw, 07.09.2017 o godzinie 06∶21 -0700, użytkownik Rich Freeman
>> > napisał:
>> > > On Thu, S
W dniu czw, 07.09.2017 o godzinie 16∶42 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman
napisał:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > W dniu czw, 07.09.2017 o godzinie 06∶21 -0700, użytkownik Rich Freeman
> > napisał:
> > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > > >
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu czw, 07.09.2017 o godzinie 06∶21 -0700, użytkownik Rich Freeman
> napisał:
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> > > > > > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> >
>> > Don't you think there is a difference b
W dniu czw, 07.09.2017 o godzinie 06∶21 -0700, użytkownik Rich Freeman
napisał:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > Don't you think there is a difference between downloading a package
> > that has a known upstream a
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:44:00 -0700
Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> In general I would just comment that if anything we get too few
> requests for spending money and not too many.
Not surprising, though I had ideas on lots of spending, events, travel
reimbursement, developer systems, etc.
> I don't think
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:32 AM, William L. Thomson Jr.
wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 10:26:10 -0400
> "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 18:03:21 +0800 (HKT)
>> Brendan Horan wrote:
>>
>> > Just an update for everyone :
>> > R0b0t1, has the Power 6+
>> > Johnson, has the Sparc
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 10:26:10 -0400
"William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 18:03:21 +0800 (HKT)
> Brendan Horan wrote:
>
> > Just an update for everyone :
> > R0b0t1, has the Power 6+
> > Johnson, has the Sparc T5120
> >
> > Still working out shipping/logistics
>
> If someone h
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017 15:56:04 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> Open questions:
> --
> - Are there existing use cases that I've missed, where migration to
> grub-2 CANNOT be done?
I left grub sometime ago for syslinux/pxelinux/extlinux. I run that on
everything now even UEFI. I much
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 18:03:21 +0800 (HKT)
Brendan Horan wrote:
> Just an update for everyone :
> R0b0t1, has the Power 6+
> Johnson, has the Sparc T5120
>
> Still working out shipping/logistics
If someone has access to say a company UPS or FedEx account. They may
have discounted rates based on v
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:04:34 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> >>> Do we routinely confirm that any site we list in SRC_URI has
> >>> permission to redistribute files? That seems like a slippery
> >>> slope.
> >>
> >> We don't, and for a package that c
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> Don't you think there is a difference between downloading a package
> that has a known upstream and that is also carried by other distros,
> and downloading a license-less package from a random
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> Do we routinely confirm that any site we list in SRC_URI has
>>> permission to redistribute files? That seems like a slippery
>>> slope.
>>
>> We don't, and for a package that comes with a license (as the vast
>> majority of packages does) it norm
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> Do we routinely confirm that any site we list in SRC_URI has
>> permission to redistribute files? That seems like a slippery slope.
>
> We don't, and for a package that comes with a license (
Just an update for everyone :
R0b0t1, has the Power 6+
Johnson, has the Sparc T5120
Still working out shipping/logistics
No takers on the HPPA or the Ia64
The HPPA box is nice , really! :)
Thanks
brendan
- On 7 Sep, 2017, at 1:39 AM, R0b0t1 r03...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 07:42:31 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> >+if [[ "${EAPI}" -lt 6 ]]; then
>
> EAPI is not a number. The next one we'll call gray-grizzly just to
> prove the point.
Careful, you're turning into me.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017, Gordon Pettey wrote:
>>
>>> Can these package.mask notes stop saying "no alternative found"
>>> when it's obvious five seconds of Google searching was not even
>>> pe
Floyd Anderson posted on Thu, 07 Sep 2017 03:13:45 +0200 as excerpted:
>>+# To use, an ebuild could contain a line like:
>>+# AMD64_URI=http//linktothearchspecificpatch
>
> Even it’s just a comment:
>
> # AMD64_URI="http://link-to-the-arch-specific-patch";
>
> looks friendlier to my eyes. H
20 matches
Mail list logo
