On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 23:30:37 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Meanwhile, having buildpkg on virtual packages[1] is what amuses me.
> There, most of the benefits of binpkgs that arguably apply even to
> prebuilt binary and no-bin packages as long as they package and
> install /
On 11/08/17 03:08, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> Lets go down this rabbit hole.
Let's not.
--
Sam Jorna (wraeth)
GnuPG ID: D6180C26
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
William L. Thomson Jr. posted on Tue, 08 Aug 2017 12:37:42 -0400 as
excerpted:
> I make a lot of binaries for use on other systems, to expedite updates.
> It does not make sense for some packages to ever be a binary package.
>
> Packages like -bin packages or gentoo-sources, which are just source
Sergei Trofimovich posted on Tue, 08 Aug 2017 16:53:22 +0100 as excerpted:
> The failure happens when live glibc- ebuild is installed:
> * QA Notice: Missing gen_usr_ldscript for libm-2.26.90.so * ERROR:
> sys-libs/glibc-::gentoo failed:
> * add those ldscripts
>
> The problem here i
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017, at 15:43 CDT, "Andreas K. Huettel"
wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> it's time we do a proper lead election and have a toolchain meeting again.
>
> So, here's the plan:
>
> 1) team lead election:
> * Nominations from now until August 18, by e-mailing to the toolchain alias
> * Vot
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 06:58:57AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant as
> >an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt package.
>
> Thanks for al
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:33:54 +1000
"Sam Jorna (wraeth)" wrote:
>
> This is no greater risk than syncing from a potentially compromised
> mirror. You would use a mirror you trust and, similarly (perhaps even
> more so) you would use a binhost you trust.
Getting a bit ridiculous now. Let me get my
On 17-07-26 11:56:39, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> sys-boot/plymouth is orphan for a long time. Its old 0.8.x versions where
> having
> important bugs that were fixed in 0.9.x, but 0.9 is also plenty of issues.
> Then,
> either this is adopted by someone able to handle all that issues or we will
> need
On 10-08-2017 16:09:53 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> ...which probably makes sense if you treat is as a continuation of mail-
> client/mutt package. However, since we package it separately, using
> the same name is going to create more confusion than renaming it to
> match the package name.
>
> If
Hi Gentoo Team,
As some of you may noticed i started to clean up some old patches in the
gentoo portage tree. I did so already a while ago, and like before I'm
using a small script in order to identify unused patches.
I few days ago i started to hack again on that script and thought about
to make
On czw, 2017-08-10 at 14:16 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 10-08-2017 14:13:29 +0200, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > * Nicolas Bock schrieb am 10.08.17 um 11:35 Uhr:
> > > It does of course. What's appropriate here depends on whether we
> > > think somebody might want to have both mutt and neomutt
On czw, 2017-08-10 at 11:35 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:10:04AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On czw, 2017-08-10 at 09:54 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > On 10-08-2017 09:40:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > On czw, 2017-08-10 at 06:58 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
This may take me some time. The live cd doesn't even seem to use this. And
that plugin is unmaintained so I forked it.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> On 17-08-04 17:17:05, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > On K, 2017-07-26 at 11:56 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > sys-boot/plymout
On 10-08-2017 14:13:29 +0200, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> * Nicolas Bock schrieb am 10.08.17 um 11:35 Uhr:
> > It does of course. What's appropriate here depends on whether we
> > think somebody might want to have both mutt and neomutt installed
> > at the same time. If we don't allow this use case
* Nicolas Bock schrieb am 10.08.17 um 11:35 Uhr:
> It does of course. What's appropriate here depends on whether we
> think somebody might want to have both mutt and neomutt installed
> at the same time. If we don't allow this use case, we don't have
> to worry about eselect and the neomutt bina
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:10:04AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
On czw, 2017-08-10 at 09:54 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 10-08-2017 09:40:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On czw, 2017-08-10 at 06:58 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> >
On czw, 2017-08-10 at 09:54 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 10-08-2017 09:40:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On czw, 2017-08-10 at 06:58 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to add neomutt to the
On 10-08-2017 09:40:30 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On czw, 2017-08-10 at 06:58 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant as
> > > an alternative and not a r
On czw, 2017-08-10 at 06:58 +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Nicolas Bock wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to add neomutt to the tree. This new package is meant as
> > an alternative and not a replacement of the existing mutt package.
>
> Thanks for all o
19 matches
Mail list logo
