On Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:33:09 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On sob, 2017-06-03 at 13:00 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > This whole thing definitely needs more thought and feedback but for
> > now those extra restrictions seem quite natural to me, allow easy
> > solving on the PM side and allow to h
On sob, 2017-06-03 at 13:00 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> This whole thing definitely needs more thought and feedback but for now
> those extra restrictions seem quite natural to me, allow easy solving
> on the PM side and allow to have useful feedback from repoman.
>
Well, I'll try to figure ou
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 06/02/2017 04:38 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> # Pacho Ramos (02 Jun 2017)
>> # Relies on obsolete and vulnerable webkit-gtk version and bundles some libs
>> # (#597532). Removal in a month.
>> x11-misc/rednotebook
>>
>
> The bundled libs w
On 06/02/2017 04:38 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> # Pacho Ramos (02 Jun 2017)
> # Relies on obsolete and vulnerable webkit-gtk version and bundles some libs
> # (#597532). Removal in a month.
> x11-misc/rednotebook
>
The bundled libs wouldn't be too hard to eliminate, but we didn't have
packages for
On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 15:55:17 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On pią, 2017-06-02 at 13:27 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 23:31:25 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > There are probably dozens of ways to make that non
> > > > deterministic. Here's one: USE='-*'. App
On Sat, 03 Jun 2017 09:58:28 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> and that's a small one. I guess we could avoid this if you restricted
> those remotes to the source package used to build them all.
I think in the event they're a form of conventional
foo
foo-dev
foo-dbg
etc, under the knowledge t
On sob, 2017-06-03 at 03:22 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2017 16:51:25 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > ...so if a Gentoo package is split into 40 packages in Debian, are you
> > going to list all of them?
>
> If it would be useful to do so, maybe.
>
> But its a text file, peopl
On 06/01/2017 11:59 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 18:36:24 -0700
> Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
>> +1. Otherwise sounds good. But if we do this for Debian, will there be
>> movement to add in package names for rpm-based distros? Arch? BSD?
>> Slackware? Where do we draw the line?
>
>
