On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:00:30 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> > - Have a separate anyvimishthing directory, and make both vim and
> > neovim look there, and only make plugins that have been tested to
> > work with both install to that directory.
>
> ...and then vimthreesome for things that work with t
On śro, 2017-05-31 at 23:54 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 02:32:24 +0700
> "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" wrote:
> > - implementing "nvim-syntax" (and `app-nvim/*`?) and duplicate all
> > the installed files
> >
> > - patching NeoVim source to include Vim's runtimedirs (incl. "
On 05/31/2017 03:54 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 02:32:24 +0700
> "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" wrote:
>> - implementing "nvim-syntax" (and `app-nvim/*`?) and duplicate all
>> the installed files
>>
>> - patching NeoVim source to include Vim's runtimedirs (incl. "after"
>> dir),
On Wed, 31 May 2017 23:54:59 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> - Have a separate anyvimishthing directory, and make both vim and
> neovim look there, and only make plugins that have been tested to work
> with both install to that directory.
+1
pgpmXJgzQwGtk.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signa
This has been pushed.
On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 02:32:24 +0700
"Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" wrote:
> - implementing "nvim-syntax" (and `app-nvim/*`?) and duplicate all
> the installed files
>
> - patching NeoVim source to include Vim's runtimedirs (incl. "after"
> dir), // NeoVim upstream highly disagree with such way, if an
On Wed, 31 May 2017 21:02:24 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> No, it can't. That's the whole point. The algorithm must be defined so
> that it is always predictable independently of order
So what's this mysterious algorithm then?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Hi.
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
wrote:
> Currently, we have a situation, that there are two Vim's: "old" one
(vim8) and
> NeoVim... Unfortunately, both of them have different runtimedirs...
>
> ... NeoVim supports Vim's plugins/scripts very well (although I
> didn'
Hi,
On 31.05.2017 21:16, Michał Górny wrote:
>> How do you evaluate these options:
>>
>> a) Keep libexpatu.so + change libexpatw.so to CPPFLAGS=-DXML_UNICODE
>>
>> b) Drop libexpatu.so + change libexpatw.so to CPPFLAGS=-DXML_UNICODE
>
> Does any other distribution use libexpatu.so? If not, the
Currently, we have a situation, that there are two Vim's: "old" one (vim8) and
NeoVim (for those who do not know: a fork of Vim with much and much more clean
code, many neat features and so on).
Unfortunately, both of them have different runtimedirs: XDG ones for NeoVim
and the ones you know fo
On śro, 2017-05-31 at 14:19 +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> The next release of dev-libs/expat is not far away and there are two
> things that I would appreciate input with, before the next bump in Gentoo:
>
>
> -DXML_UNICODE_WCHAR_T issues and Gentoo/Debian mismatch
> =
On śro, 2017-05-31 at 19:39 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > Again, you *need* to process the constraints in order. '!a?
> > > ( b ) !b? ( a )' is not deterministic when none of a and b are
> > > enabled otherwise.
> >
> > You can't rely on any particular order of constraints, especially when
On Wed, 31 May 2017 15:04:52 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On śro, 2017-05-31 at 10:38 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > > What if I specifically set USE=-bar in make.conf ? Do we really
> > > > want PM to override that without telling me ?
> > >
> > > Yes. Unless you specifically and explici
Hi everyone,
The Gentoo Council will be meeting in two weeks. If anyone has any
issues we need to discuss, please let me know and I'll put it on the
agenda. Thanks.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BA
On śro, 2017-05-31 at 10:38 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > What if I specifically set USE=-bar in make.conf ? Do we really
> > > want PM to override that without telling me ?
> >
> > Yes. Unless you specifically and explicitly disable that (globally or
> > for USE=bar), in which case the PM
Alexis Ballier posted on Wed, 31 May 2017 09:32:57 +0200 as excerpted:
>> For example:
>>
>> foo? ( bar )
>>
>> would mean 'if you have USE=foo, then USE=bar is enabled as well'. Not
>> 'find some random solution which satisfies this'. In other words, here
>> changing USE=foo into USE=-foo is
Hi!
The next release of dev-libs/expat is not far away and there are two
things that I would appreciate input with, before the next bump in Gentoo:
-DXML_UNICODE_WCHAR_T issues and Gentoo/Debian mismatch
===
With USE=unicode, on Gentoo two ex
On Wed, 31 May 2017 10:03:12 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On śro, 2017-05-31 at 09:32 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:55:17 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > On wto, 2017-05-30 at 20:46 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 30 May 2017 20:11:38 +0200
> >
On śro, 2017-05-31 at 09:32 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:55:17 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On wto, 2017-05-30 at 20:46 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 May 2017 20:11:38 +0200
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > > Of course, we could just
On Wed, 31 May 2017 09:54:56 +0200
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:51:33 +0100
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 31 May 2017 09:35:04 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> > > On śro, 2017-05-31 at 08:24 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:55:17 +02
On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:51:33 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 09:35:04 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > On śro, 2017-05-31 at 08:24 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:55:17 +0200
> > > Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > For example:
> > > >
> > > > foo
On Wed, 31 May 2017 09:35:04 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On śro, 2017-05-31 at 08:24 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:55:17 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> > > For example:
> > >
> > > foo? ( bar )
> > >
> > > would mean 'if you have USE=foo, then USE=bar is enabled
On śro, 2017-05-31 at 08:24 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:55:17 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > For example:
> >
> > foo? ( bar )
> >
> > would mean 'if you have USE=foo, then USE=bar is enabled as well'.
>
> What about "if bar cannot be enabled, then turn foo off"?
>
On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:24:20 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:55:17 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
> > For example:
> >
> > foo? ( bar )
> >
> > would mean 'if you have USE=foo, then USE=bar is enabled as well'.
>
> What about "if bar cannot be enabled, then turn foo off
On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:55:17 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On wto, 2017-05-30 at 20:46 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 May 2017 20:11:38 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > Of course, we could just validate all the possible cases via
> > > > > repoman, and reject the eb
On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:55:17 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> For example:
>
> foo? ( bar )
>
> would mean 'if you have USE=foo, then USE=bar is enabled as well'.
What about "if bar cannot be enabled, then turn foo off"?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
26 matches
Mail list logo
