Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] python-r1.eclass: any-of dep API support

2017-05-27 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 05/20/2017 06:30 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Please review. > > -- > Best regards, > Michał Górny > > It looks much as you mentioned it'd be: moving code around and cutting down duplication. Looks good to me. I really appreciate the example in patch 7, which makes it a little more clear

[gentoo-dev] php-pear-lib-r1.eclass Deprecation and removal notice

2017-05-27 Thread Brian Evans
I have just marked php-pear-lib-r1 as DEAD in the Gentoo repository. This eclass has a call in pkg_setup which many packages used ${FILESDIR} to reference a file needed to add a channel to php's pear system. Recently, changes in portage causes all packages depending on it in this way to fail as $

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-27 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 05/24/2017 12:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote: Yes, I *do not want feedback* on *how to do Gentoo* from people who do *not help me do Gentoo* but instead only complain and demand. But you do gentoo wrong, so as a user I'd like you to reconsider what you wrote there and maybe take a long vacati

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-27 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 05/23/2017 12:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > [snip] > Your comments? > Since it's adding a list instead of warping an existing one, I say go ahead on the condition that everything important finds its way to a more open list. I'm subscribed to enough as it is. I am skeptical that it will lead to