On 22/05/17 21:05, Matthias Maier wrote:
>> Were this an actual office, this would be better solved with a "ok,
>> we've clearly been working too hard this week, everyone stop, ITS PUB
>> O-CLOCK!"
> This is most definitely true for almost everything going on for the last
> days in Gentoo.
Just *da
> Were this an actual office, this would be better solved with a "ok,
> we've clearly been working too hard this week, everyone stop, ITS PUB
> O-CLOCK!"
This is most definitely true for almost everything going on for the last
days in Gentoo.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 22 May 2017 14:24:24 +1000
Sam Jorna wrote:
> I suspect it's likely a misunderstanding - without notification, all
> anyone from Proxy Maint sees is proxy-maint being removed. An E-Mail
> to proxy-maint@g.o explaining that you've spoken to and are taking
> over proxying of the package wo
On Mon, 22 May 2017 06:10:11 +0200
Patrick Lauer wrote:
> ... Now that we know how it goes we can skip the rest and just glare
> at Michal for not being a reasonable person once more, and just
> continue doing useful stuff.
Were this an actual office, this would be better solved with a "ok,
we'v
Although, I didn't go too far into detail looking through your patches,
I will do later.
On 22/05/17 11:48, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> On 05/19/2017 09:08 PM, Luke A. Guest wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I posted a bug back in August,
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592060, to discuss adding Ada
>> support into Gentoo's toolchain.eclass.
>> Thoughts?
> Did you have a
Hi Luke,
On 05/19/2017 09:08 PM, Luke A. Guest wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted a bug back in August,
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592060, to discuss adding Ada
> support into Gentoo's toolchain.eclass.
> Thoughts?
Did you have a look at https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592060 ?
I
