On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:32:21AM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote
> Except that "switching back" from gcc-5 to gcc-4 doesn't really work,
> and that gcc-4 will happily use gcc-5 libraries, with unintended
> consequences.
It can be done, but it takes a little work. I do a contributed build
for
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Christian Bricart wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> from time to time, I need to make (and maintain) modifications to an
> ebuild from the main tree in my local overlay.
> So basically, I create the directory structure from
> /usr/portage/// under
> /usr/local/portage///, copy
Hi all,
from time to time, I need to make (and maintain) modifications to an
ebuild from the main tree in my local overlay.
So basically, I create the directory structure from
/usr/portage/// under
/usr/local/portage///, copy over the ebuild and do my
modifications in the ebuild.
So far how an ove
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 26. April 2017, 02:37:17 CEST schrieb Francesco Riosa:
>> 2017-04-26 0:26 GMT+02:00 Andreas K. Huettel :
>> > Am Sonntag, 23. April 2017, 14:35:48 CEST schrieb Michał Górny:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I'm thinking of masking o
On śro, 2017-04-26 at 11:42 +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Michał Górny schrieb:
> > The most important goal of having the packages masked is that it would
> > cause Portage to verbosely complain whenever the users have it
> > installed. With appropriate comment (displayed by Portage)
Michał Górny schrieb:
The most important goal of having the packages masked is that it would
cause Portage to verbosely complain whenever the users have it
installed. With appropriate comment (displayed by Portage), we could
clearly inform users that they need to upgrade gcc and switch to a new
v
Am Mittwoch, 26. April 2017, 02:37:17 CEST schrieb Francesco Riosa:
> 2017-04-26 0:26 GMT+02:00 Andreas K. Huettel :
> > Am Sonntag, 23. April 2017, 14:35:48 CEST schrieb Michał Górny:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm thinking of masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc, in particular
> > > older than the 4