Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

2017-04-20 Thread Walter Dnes
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 05:52:20PM -0500, Matthias Maier wrote > (A-C) gcc-5.4.0 and gcc-4.9.4 are slotted separately. What is going to > be the default is entirely up to you. Good to hear. Like I said, on a fresh install I'd go with the current version (5.4). But for now, I'll wait for other

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

2017-04-20 Thread Matthias Maier
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017, at 17:17 CDT, "Walter Dnes" wrote: > ...fun !NOT. If you're doing a fresh install, ***WITH A GCC5-BUILT > INSTALL CD AND STAGE 3***, then yes, go for it. But changing horses in > mid-stream can be painfull. Would it hurt to stay with 4.9.4 for the > time being, assuming

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

2017-04-20 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 20.04.2017 kell 18:17, kirjutas Walter Dnes: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 07:36:03AM +0200, Tomas Mozes wrote > > > > The default is new: > > https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2015-10-22-gcc-5-new-c++1 > > 1-abi.html > >   And the news item says... > > > Display-If-Ins

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

2017-04-20 Thread Walter Dnes
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 07:36:03AM +0200, Tomas Mozes wrote > > The default is new: > https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2015-10-22-gcc-5-new-c++11-abi.html And the news item says... > Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-5 ...which means that people like me, who currently have 4.9.4,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-20 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:49:04 -0700 Christopher Head wrote: > > >If your writing new python code against say 3.4 and not 3.6. Not sure > >about that... Seems like it would keep things bound to older versions > >and never let things move forward. > > Not true. I will certainly move forward when a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-20 Thread Christopher Head
On April 10, 2017 11:12:10 AM PDT, "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: >Are you running stable? There are other versions in tree. 3.4, 3.5, >3.6. If you were running unstable, you would have 4 pythons, including >2.7. That you only have 2 seems like you are running stable. Yep. Absolutely. I bring i

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: changed default bedup configuration file in >=app-backup/burp-2.0.0

2017-04-20 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2017-04-19 17:39, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: >> Display-If-Installed: app-backup/burp > Wouldn't you wanna limit this to <2.0.54 ? Otherwise this will pop > up for the consumers of 2.0.54 as well. Might as well, although at present there is no 2.0.54. >> /etc/burp/burp.conf . > You have an extra '.