# Hans de Graaff (03 Mar 2017)
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
# Bindings for old webkit versions that have open security
# issues. No reverse dependencies. Bug #608608
dev-ruby/ruby-webkit-gtk
dev-ruby/ruby-webkit-gtk2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
# Andreas Sturmlechner (03 Mar 2017)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Reported to be broken;
# QA issues, fails to build with GCC-5, ffmpeg-3
# Bugs #608408, #569958, #610746
media-video/lives
# Andreas Sturmlechner (03 Mar 2017)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Dead upstream, Qt4Webkit,
# fails to build. Bug #602260
x11-misc/andromeda
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:36:16 -0500
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 04:53 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >>
> >> Back on topic:
> >>
> >> What kind of dependency do we need, anyway? William, are you saying
> >> that if I upgrade dev-lang/go, then things will break, but if I
> >> delete dev-lan
On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:14:47 +0100 Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2017-02-28 10:52, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> > I use hasufell's repo too. I'm surprised we haven't made it more
> > official.
>
> The public Gentoo git mirror is
>
> https://github.com/gentoo-mirror/gentoo
Please note that this is
On 03/02/2017 04:53 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>>
>> Back on topic:
>>
>> What kind of dependency do we need, anyway? William, are you saying
>> that if I upgrade dev-lang/go, then things will break, but if I delete
>> dev-lang/go, everything is fine?
>
> It's likely like ocaml: you link your progr
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:46:22 -0500
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 04:30 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >
> > The point is to specify dependencies declaratively. A dependency
> > expresses a dependency, not an action. If you can't express the
> > kind of dependency you need, then we need ei
On 03/02/2017 04:30 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> The point is to specify dependencies declaratively. A dependency
> expresses a dependency, not an action. If you can't express the kind of
> dependency you need, then we need either labels or another *DEPEND
> variable to take care of it, not a bo
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:06:45 -0800
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 11:24 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On 03/02/2017 02:05 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This is why we can't have nice things.
> >>
> >> For those that are interested, I'm planning to to make --with-bdeps
> >> automatical
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:25:54 -0500
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 04:06 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> >>
> >> I agree with this ^ but I don't think portage should rebuild for
> >> DEPEND at all. It creates one more dangerous "it works in
> >> portage!" situation that will plague users of other p
On 03/02/2017 04:06 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>>
>> I agree with this ^ but I don't think portage should rebuild for DEPEND
>> at all. It creates one more dangerous "it works in portage!" situation
>> that will plague users of other package managers.
>>
>> (I'm not saying it couldn't be useful, but it
On 03/02/2017 11:24 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 02:05 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>>>
>>> This is why we can't have nice things.
>>
>> For those that are interested, I'm planning to to make --with-bdeps
>> automatically enabled when possible:
>>
>
>
> I agree with this ^ but I don't thi
On 03/02/2017 02:05 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>>
>> This is why we can't have nice things.
>
> For those that are interested, I'm planning to to make --with-bdeps
> automatically enabled when possible:
>
I agree with this ^ but I don't think portage should rebuild for DEPEND
at all. It creates one
On 03/02/2017 06:47 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 09:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>>
>>> In other words, the ":=" only does something special in RDEPEND. That
>>> makes sense when you think of it as meaning "the thing will break"
>>> rather than "I want to do a rebuild." The only reaso
W dniu 02.03.2017, czw o godzinie 15∶09 +0100, użytkownik Michael
Haubenwallner napisał:
> On 01/21/2017 11:59 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Include arch/amd64/no-multilib in the hardened no-multilib amd64
> > variant. Confirmed with profile-dumper that it does not currently change
> > anything.
> >
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:56:37 +
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:47:35 -0500
> Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On 03/02/2017 09:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > >>
> > >> In other words, the ":=" only does something special in RDEPEND.
> > >> That makes sense when you think of it as
On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 09:47:35 -0500
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 09:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >>
> >> In other words, the ":=" only does something special in RDEPEND.
> >> That makes sense when you think of it as meaning "the thing will
> >> break" rather than "I want to do a rebuild."
On 03/02/2017 09:24 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> In other words, the ":=" only does something special in RDEPEND. That
>> makes sense when you think of it as meaning "the thing will break"
>> rather than "I want to do a rebuild." The only reason it's not an error
>> to put them in DEPEND is becaus
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/02/2017 04:58 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>>
>> Is it really abusing ?
>> := deps in DEPEND only would also make sense for e.g. code generators
>>
>
> Slot operator dependencies are ignored in DEPEND:
>
> Indicates that any slot value
On 01/21/2017 11:59 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Include arch/amd64/no-multilib in the hardened no-multilib amd64
> variant. Confirmed with profile-dumper that it does not currently change
> anything.
> ---
> profiles/hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/parent | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
On 03/02/2017 04:58 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> Is it really abusing ?
> := deps in DEPEND only would also make sense for e.g. code generators
>
Slot operator dependencies are ignored in DEPEND:
Indicates that any slot value is acceptable. In addition, for runtime
dependencies, indicates
On 02/13/2017 03:40 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> ---
> profiles/prefix/parent | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/profiles/prefix/parent b/profiles/prefix/parent
> index 8f0e9fd7471d..3eaf2c441360 100644
> --- a/profiles/prefix/parent
> +++ b/profiles/prefix/parent
> @@ -1 +1,2
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> This patch will add some additional text to bring some additional notice
> to users
> about the security considerations of a specific kernel and direct them
> to the
> upstream website for further information. See bug #599454
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 18:18:01 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> To avoid abusing slot dependencies for dev-lang/go since it is not
> needed at runtime I need to do the following.
Is it really abusing ?
:= deps in DEPEND only would also make sense for e.g. code generators
24 matches
Mail list logo
