> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Robin H Johnson wrote:
> Why did Repoman not complain about either of these?
Repoman has been fixed in bug 579460, following the council decision.
Also app-emacs/ebuild-mode was changed for removal of the $Id$ header,
and I think a similar change was committed for Vim.
On 02/23/2017 03:58 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:50:45 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>>
https://projects.gentoo.org/pms/6/pms.html#x1-180003.1.1 "Category Names"
>>
>>> I don't see a requirement here, only note on most
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:38:42PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> So what is your suggestion? Keep the status quo and leave all Id,
> Header, etc. in place, including profiles and init scripts? Or are
> these Ids only useful for ebuilds?
I did not ever say it was going to be in init scripts.
Here'
20170223-07:37 aballier db28d57858
dev-python/astrodendro 20170226-01:19 bicatali 10da3b8d20
dev-python/breathe 20170226-16:43 bicatali 64accd661a
dev-python/ntplib20170224-03:40 zmedico 011bfe3f17
dev-python/pytest-arraydiff
W dniu 26.02.2017, nie o godzinie 21∶16 +0100, użytkownik Lars Wendler
napisał:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:59:19 + Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 03:05:09PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > As the council has decided in its 2014-10-14 meeting (and confirmed
> > > again i
Fix python_wrapper_setup function to move setting environment variables
for PATH and PKG_CONFIG_PATH outside the 'if'. Otherwise, they are only
set on the initial invocation of python_wrapper_setup for the particular
impl and do not apply to subsequent invocations (e.g. further
distutils-r1 phases)
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 22:07:48 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
>>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Robin H Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> The 2014-10-14 meeting did NOT specify what CVS headers were in
>>> question, and it was later decided that this was $Header$
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Lars Wendler wrote:
> There is no need to enable it by default. But it is a very nice way
> to verify ebuild changes if being enabled locally on a git clone of
> the tree. Ever since portage was migrated to git I had this line in
> my .git/info/attributes file on my dev
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 22:07:48 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Robin H Johnson wrote:
>
>> The 2014-10-14 meeting did NOT specify what CVS headers were in
>> question, and it was later decided that this was $Header$, not
>> $Id$.
>
>When and by whom was that decided? The
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Robin H Johnson wrote:
> The 2014-10-14 meeting did NOT specify what CVS headers were in
> question, and it was later decided that this was $Header$, not $Id$.
When and by whom was that decided? The unanimous council decision was
to remove "CVS headers" and the obvious
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:32:56 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:24:38 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>>
>>>Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lars Wendler:
I am completely against removal of this hea
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:24:38 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
>>Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lars Wendler:
>>> I am completely against removal of this header line. It does _not_ do
>>> any harm and I don't understand why
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:24:38 +0100 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lars Wendler:
>> I am completely against removal of this header line. It does _not_ do
>> any harm and I don't understand why people want it to be removed so
>> badly.
>> Now QA again w
Am Sonntag, 26. Februar 2017, 21:16:28 CET schrieb Lars Wendler:
> I am completely against removal of this header line. It does _not_ do
> any harm and I don't understand why people want it to be removed so
> badly.
> Now QA again wants to do a questionable action _without_ any approval
> from neit
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:16:28 +0100
Lars Wendler wrote:
> How about QA finally starts acting on useful issues or at least do
> actions that make sense?
Part of the job of QA is to improve the overall quality of the tree.
This includes going through and fixing historical mistakes. You may
think it'
On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:59:19 + Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 03:05:09PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> As the council has decided in its 2014-10-14 meeting (and confirmed
>> again in the 2016-11-13 meeting), CVS headers should be removed after
>> the migration to Git.
>Th
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Robin H. Johnson
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 03:05:09PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > As the council has decided in its 2014-10-14 meeting (and confirmed
> > again in the 2016-11-13 meeting), CVS headers should be removed after
> > the migration to Git.
>
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 03:05:09PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> As the council has decided in its 2014-10-14 meeting (and confirmed
> again in the 2016-11-13 meeting), CVS headers should be removed after
> the migration to Git.
The 2014-10-14 meeting did NOT specify what CVS headers were in
quest
# Johannes Huber (26 Feb 2017)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. No maintainer. Dead upstream.
# Current version is outdated. Open QA issues (#522676,#526284).
# Bug #607998.
dev-vcs/veracity
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> As the council has decided in its 2014-10-14 meeting (and confirmed
> again in the 2016-11-13 meeting), CVS headers should be removed after
> the migration to Git. Until recently, this was blocked by repoman
> still checking for the $Id$ line. The
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Andrew Savchenko
wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:16:15 + Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:58:50 +0300
> > Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:50:45 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017, Andrew Savchen
On 25 February 2017 at 15:05, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> As the council has decided in its 2014-10-14 meeting (and confirmed
> again in the 2016-11-13 meeting), CVS headers should be removed after
> the migration to Git. Until recently, this was blocked by repoman
> still checking for the $Id$ line.
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:16:15 + Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:58:50 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:50:45 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2017, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > > >> https://projects.gentoo.org/pms/6/pms.html#x1-18
23 matches
Mail list logo
