On Jan 11 13:34:09, sven.e...@gmx.de wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2017, 13:36:15 CET schrieb Jan Stary:
> > > You arguing that 40MB is nothing on modern systems (which, by the way is
> > > not exactly true, talking about embedded ones).
> >
> > Can you gove an example of an embedded system wit
On 01/10/2017 06:54 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> These are workarounds. Let me get back to the original question:
> would you please consider having _uncompressed_ manpages as the default?
>
> On this particular system, the bzipped /usr/share/man/ is 67M.
> The uncompressed man/ is 108M. That's 40M s
Am Dienstag, 10. Januar 2017, 13:36:15 CET schrieb Jan Stary:
> > You arguing that 40MB is nothing on modern systems (which, by the way is
> > not exactly true, talking about embedded ones).
>
> Can you gove an example of an embedded system with manpages?
My Raspberry Pi 3. ;-)
Cheers
Sven
si
Le 11/01/2017 8:30, Ulrich Mueller a écrit :
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Zac Medico wrote:
On 01/10/2017 01:56 PM, Bernard Cafarelli wrote:
gnustep-base/gnustep-make has a USE flag (libobjc2) masked globally
in
base/package.use.mask, and unmasked on specific arches in
arch/{amd64,x86}/package.use.m
On 01/10/2017 11:30 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> On 01/10/2017 01:56 PM, Bernard Cafarelli wrote:
>>> But repoman replied with a batch of dependency.bad errors...
>>> Does package.use.mask (stable and ~arch) have a higher priority on
>>> package.use.
