Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 85 bugs

2017-01-09 Thread Jonas Stein
> As gentoo-bot can ping me when my packages have Github PRs opened > against them, can we not get something set up to assign bugs > automatically, at least for the "easy" stuff. > > There is a chance this has already been set up - and its not on by > default because someone may get a rogue bug as

Re: [gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 85 bugs

2017-01-09 Thread Ian Whyman
On 9 January 2017 at 22:00, Alex Alexander wrote: > Our bug queue has 85 bugs! > > If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. > > To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 > > Thanks! I'm almost certain this has been asked before but... As gentoo-bot can ping

[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 85 bugs

2017-01-09 Thread Alex Alexander
Our bug queue has 85 bugs! If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 Thanks!

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-09 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:08:22 +0100 Jan Stary wrote: > This is Gentoo 2.2 (4.4.6-gentoo x86_64). That doesn't actually tell any Gentoo user anything about your system except a very specific few bits of data which do not relate at all to the rest of the subject matter of your e-mail. Kind regards

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 09:30:11 + Mike Auty wrote: > As mentioned in [2,3,others]. You'll then need to reinstall all > packages. Well, most. Probably a subset of "all", and if anything gets stuck half way, you'll want to know which remaining packages need merged. find /usr/share/man/ -na

Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: KDE Workspaces 4.11 and KDE profile removal

2017-01-09 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Monday, 9 January 2017 at 01:15, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > > How about arm64, amd64-fbsd and so on? :) I've only added arch profiles for which there are actual keywords in the affected packages.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/7] RFC1: toolchain.eclass prefix support

2017-01-09 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Benda Xu wrote: > Hi, > > This patch series is splitted from the previous one > > > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/8a7ac352cb047567309c70aaf7105305 > > Note that the splitting is not perfect when different kinds > of updates happen in adjacent li

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-09 Thread Mike Auty
Hiya Jan, The following snippet from Ingo is correct: > So, you want to hear something constructive? Your best option is to > just decompress that stuff on your system. (Gentoo is famous for > its excessive configurability - maybe there is even an option?) We are both famous for our excessive

[gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

2017-01-09 Thread Jan Stary
This is Gentoo 2.2 (4.4.6-gentoo x86_64). The system manpages seem to be bzipped as in /usr/share/man/man1/ls.1.bz2 Why is that? Is there any benefit to compressing the manpages nowadays? IMHO it only adds a layer of complexity, for very questionable benefit (i.e. disk space): how much of the over