On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 22:55:27 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> Description how to test this package...
>
Alternatively, why not have a metatag that just
permits a valid URL that points to testing instructions?
Benefits:
* Multiple packages can share instructions without redundancy
* Edits
Hi all,
8 packages are using either rbd or rados USE flag for Rados
Block Device support:
use.local.desc:app-backup/bareos:rados - Enable rados storage backend
use.local.desc:app-emulation/ganeti:rbd - Enable rados block device support via
sys-cluster/ceph
use.local.desc:app-emulation/libvirt:rb
On 12/25/2016 02:55 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> What is a recommended way to describe how runtime testing should be
> done? Some packages are quite complex and it is desired not only to
> run them, but to run with some args or do some actions.
>
> Some ideas:
>
> ...
The Emacs team came up
/systemdgenie 20161225-19:24 johucf9825c
app-crypt/manuale 20161220-16:36 mrueg 67742bf
app-crypt/veracrypt20161212-11:23 gokturk 4702d71
dev-lua/luaposix 20161218-11:57 jlec7545975
dev-ml/qcheck 20161219-10:30 aballier5c833c5
dev
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:41:29 +0100 Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> Runtime testing required (which is not mandatory) needs to be filled in the
> following way:
> - Yes, you are asking to run a package after have compiled/installed it.
> - No, you don't need runtime testing (e.g. packages that insta
# Johannes Huber (25 Dec 2016)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Dead upstream. No reverse dependencies.
# No maintainer. Was introduced for media-sound/tomahwak. Uses deprecated
# EAPI.
net-libs/qtweetlib
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On December 25, 2016 9:49:02 PM GMT+09:00, Kent Fredric
wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:41:29 +0100
>Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
>
>> NOTE: I'm intending this message as a sort of announcement to invite
>everyone
>> to port their stable requests. I guess there isn't much to discuss
>here. If
>> y
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:41:29 +0100
Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
> NOTE: I'm intending this message as a sort of announcement to invite everyone
> to port their stable requests. I guess there isn't much to discuss here. If
> you don't like some of the changes that have been done, please open a
> spe
Hello all.
with the great and awesome work of Michael Palimaka (kensington) and the
support of the wg-stable, for the stabilization process, some changes on our
bugzilla have been done.
We have two new components:
- Stabilization
- Keywording
When you will choose one of those, you will see two
