On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:34:21AM +0700, gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> > On 12/11/2016 03:13 PM, gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
> >> gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
> > this might indicate a want for export GPG_TTY=$(tty)
> I don't und
gro...@gentoo.org writes:
> I hope gcj will remain in (which I use not very often but regularly). There are no real
> alternatived: pdfshuffle fails on many (otherwise normal) pdf files.
+1
I am a regular pdftk user.
Benda
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Magnus Granberg wrote:
Gcc 6.X update:
Gcc 6.3 will soon get released in one or two weeks on that the pie use flag
will get unmasked and gcj will be masked for java is removed in gcc 7
I hope gcj will remain in use not very often but regularly). There are no real alternatived
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 12/11/2016 03:13 PM, gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
this might indicate a want for export GPG_TTY=$(tty)
I don't understand what has really happened. I removed my last commit, an
attempt to commi
/libfrontend-elements 20161205-18:01 soap 527b1e9
dev-java/jaffl 20161211-14:32 chewi ba97a9a
dev-perl/extutils-pkgconfig 20161210-17:31 kentnl 7ac8116
kde-base/kactivities 20161208-12:01 johu d53d057
kde-base/plasma-workspace
Hi,
"Walter Dnes" writes:
> Are the gmp, mpc, mpfr, and isl libs included? According to the
> "Support libraries" section at https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC
They are managed by their own ebuilds.
>> Alternatively, after extracting the GCC source archive, simply
>> run the ./contrib/do
On 12/10/2016 01:12 AM, A. Wilcox wrote:
>
> So for one example, at Adélie we are focusing hard on the musl libc.
> At some point in the future, when we have things looking good, we can
> contribute that back to the official Gentoo musl overlay. Ideally,
> that would be the main Gentoo package tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/12/16 11:59, Magnus Granberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> Gcc 6.X update: Gcc 6.3 will soon get released in one or two weeks
> on that the pie use flag will get unmasked and gcj will be masked
> for java is removed in gcc 7 Package that fail with the pie f
Hans de Graaff:
> On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 17:17 +, Gokturk Yuksek wrote:
>>
>> r...@gentoo.org
>>
>> Ruby core package maintainer:
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Gentoo/Staffing_Needs/Ruby_core_
>> package_maintainer
>>
>> Ruby package maintainer:
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Projec
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 06:59:17PM +0100, Magnus Granberg wrote
> Hi
>
> Gcc 6.X update:
> Gcc 6.3 will soon get released in one or two weeks on that the
> pie use flag will get unmasked and gcj will be masked for java is
> removed in gcc 7 Package that fail with the pie flag needed to get
> fixed
On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 17:17 +, Gokturk Yuksek wrote:
>
> r...@gentoo.org
>
> Ruby core package maintainer:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Gentoo/Staffing_Needs/Ruby_core_
> package_maintainer
>
> Ruby package maintainer:
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Gentoo/Staffing_Needs/Ru
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:59:17 +0100
Magnus Granberg wrote:
> Gcc 6.3 will soon get released in one or two weeks on that the pie use flag
> will get unmasked and gcj will be masked for java is removed in gcc 7
I'm hoping you mean gcj will only be masked for new versions going
forward. I'd love to
Hi
Gcc 6.X update:
Gcc 6.3 will soon get released in one or two weeks on that the pie use flag
will get unmasked and gcj will be masked for java is removed in gcc 7
Package that fail with the pie flag needed to get fixed upstream for we are not
the only dist that use it now days.
Gcc 5.X update
On 12/11/2016 03:13 PM, gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
> gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
this might indicate a want for export GPG_TTY=$(tty)
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
Gokturk Yuksek:
> Hi all,
>
> The Staffing Needs page on the wiki [0] seems a little out of date,
> there are still mentions of "herds". I invite project leads and
> members to update it. We added a reference to it in the Mentors wiki
> page [1] and hoping to get more attention to it.
>
> Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Leno Hou
---
libs/package-manager.bash.in | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/libs/package-manager.bash.in b/libs/package-manager.bash.in
index aececfd..621f6ac 100644
--- a/libs/package-manager.bash.in
+++ b/libs/package-manager.bash.in
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ arch() {
Hello, everyone.
The Ada project seriously needs help. For some time already, it has no
active developers (George is retiring), and a lot of bugs needing
attention.
The packages maintained by aga@g.o are:
app-eselect/eselect-gnat
dev-ada/asis-gcc
dev-ada/charles
dev-lang/gnat-gcc
virtual/ada
vir
On 2016-12-11 15:13, gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
> But this commit sits in my copy of the tree, and I cannot
> push it. What can I do?
You can't push because the commit isn't signed?
If it is the last commit, just run `git commit --amend -S`
If it isn't the last commit, try `git log` to get the com
Hello *,
Today, when trying to push my commit to the repo, I got
gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device
error: gpg failed to sign the data
fatal: failed to sign the push certificate
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
When
On 12/11/2016 10:49 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 12/11/2016 02:00 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 12/11/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>> On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> I'm asking
On 12/07/2016 07:27 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 07/12/16 05:40 AM, konsolebox wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:16:45 +0800
>>> konsolebox wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:11
On 12/08/2016 06:10 AM, Doug Freed wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:29:51 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> When looking at freerdp reverse deps I noticed we are using three different
>>> names for USE flags enabling freerdp support: r
On 12/11/2016 02:00 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 12/11/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the rule
# Markos Chandras (11 Dec 2016)
# Dead upstream, no maintainer and it hasn't been bumped
# since 2013. Masking for removal in 30 days (wrt bug #489878)
sys-power/powerman
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 12/11/2016 08:05 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the rules
>>> and I was distracted, irc is not mandatory.
>>
>>
On 12/09/2016 09:46 PM, Christopher Head wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:15:06 -0500
> james wrote:
>
>> Being able to use stage-4 or stage-5 (G. forums) installs to rapidly
>> provision a collection of bare-metal systems [BGO-593218] into a wide
>> variety of hardened clusters is my passion. Un
On 12/07/2016 07:36 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
>
>
>
>> I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the rules
>> and I was distracted, irc is not mandatory.
>
> I've got confirmation that nothing has changed, so ir
27 matches
Mail list logo
