Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] depend.apache.eclass: fix for EAPI=6

2016-12-07 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/07/2016 03:59 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > I like it, actually more than my version- with one exception... if we do a > step with EAPI, we should be able to get this done without the -r1 mess. > > I'll try to whip up something reasonably elegant based on your patch...

Re: Thread moving to -nfp LIST [Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentooo 501(c) accounting]

2016-12-07 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 04:01:53PM -0500, james wrote: > Can you cross post to gentoo-dev? I'm not subscribed to that list. > Should not a wider community, particularly devs be part of the discussion? Please DO subscribe. The long response I just sent is significantly off-topic for the -dev list.

Re: Thread moving to -nfp LIST [Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentooo 501(c) accounting]

2016-12-07 Thread james
On 12/07/2016 03:02 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: I'm going to respond to this thread on the NFP list. Hey Robin, Can you cross post to gentoo-dev? I'm not subscribed to that list. Should not a wider community, particularly devs be part of the discussion? At least a quick link for folk, who a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Request for help: distributed pull request CI (pkgcheck)

2016-12-07 Thread nado
December 7, 2016 7:57 PM, "Michał Górny" wrote: > Can you think of any tools that could help me get the task done easily > and with as little of reinventing the wheel as possible? Right now, I > have just a lot of trivial shell script that checks pull request for > changes, checks them out, runs

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] depend.apache.eclass: fix for EAPI=6

2016-12-07 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2016, 04:10:26 schrieb Doug Freed: > This also fixes various other code smells. I wrote this back in the start > of October, and never got around to sending it to the list for review. A > note: given how extensively this pa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentooo 501(c) accounting

2016-12-07 Thread james
On 12/07/2016 01:53 PM, Jigme Datse Rasku wrote: I have been using LedgerSMB as when I was looking everything except SQL-Ledger (which got forked to LedgerSMB) was either too expensive (commercial, and a lot didn't run on Linux) or more pain than writing in a ledger book (easier to screw up, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Request for help: distributed pull request CI (pkgcheck)

2016-12-07 Thread Mathy Vanvoorden
Hi, I have some experience with CI and am willing to help out, I'll talk to you on IRC. Mathy On Dec 7, 2016 19:57, "Michał Górny" wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > TL;DR: I'm looking for some help to get pull-request CI running > distributed, i.e. on multiple hosts. > > > Quick history >

Thread moving to -nfp LIST [Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentooo 501(c) accounting]

2016-12-07 Thread Robin H. Johnson
I'm going to respond to this thread on the NFP list. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Trustee & Treasurer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 signature.asc De

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

2016-12-07 Thread james
On 12/07/2016 04:22 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: On 12/07/2016 06:07 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: So I just now sent email to : proxy-maint+subscr...@gentoo.org You likely want to check out [gentoo-proxy-ma...@lists.gentoo.org] instead of the project alias. The latter is restricted to Gent

[gentoo-dev] Request for help: distributed pull request CI (pkgcheck)

2016-12-07 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, everyone. TL;DR: I'm looking for some help to get pull-request CI running distributed, i.e. on multiple hosts. Quick history - The repo-mirror-ci project pretty much started as a simple cronjob running on hardware contributed to the purpose by Todd Goodman (considering how mu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentooo 501(c) accounting

2016-12-07 Thread Jigme Datse Rasku
I have been using LedgerSMB as when I was looking everything except SQL-Ledger (which got forked to LedgerSMB) was either too expensive (commercial, and a lot didn't run on Linux) or more pain than writing in a ledger book (easier to screw up, and harder to remember what I was doing anyway). As I

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentooo 501(c) accounting

2016-12-07 Thread james
On 12/07/2016 01:31 PM, james wrote: Hello, There was some discussion before about the software used for gentoo the charity (501)(c). It seems to have perked up a bit of discussion on gnucash, where all of the posting I have read suggest that gnucash is a wonderful accounting system for charit

[gentoo-dev] Gentooo 501(c) accounting

2016-12-07 Thread james
Hello, There was some discussion before about the software used for gentoo the charity (501)(c). It seems to have perked up a bit of discussion on gnucash, where all of the posting I have read suggest that gnucash is a wonderful accounting system for charity organizations. There also appear

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

2016-12-07 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 07-12-2016 a las 10:27 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius escribió: > [...] > There is only one instance of a dependency atom that requires the > tinfo flag to be disabled, and that package is an old game whos build > system and ebuild is flawed in this regard.  All others are fine with > the flag be

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

2016-12-07 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:16:47 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > > Basically you're suggesting to drop either of those modes. Now I'm > > asking, would one of those (likely tinfo mode) be workable in all > > packages? Do you find that it would cause less issues than this > > solution? And I'm talking ab

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

2016-12-07 Thread james
On 12/07/2016 02:44 AM, Duncan wrote: james posted on Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:10:16 -0500 as excerpted: Really, for someone like me, it is just best to avoid irc. FWIW, some 12 years ago now, in 2004, I started using gentoo, with the intent of contributing and potentially eventually becoming a de

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

2016-12-07 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: I'm asking recuiters directly, but unless someone changed the rules and I was distracted, irc is not mandatory. I've got confirmation that nothing has changed, so irc is not mandatory. I hope this clears any misunderstandings and puts an

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

2016-12-07 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
On 07/12/16 05:40 AM, konsolebox wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:16:45 +0800 >> konsolebox wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:11:34 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

2016-12-07 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Duncan wrote: james posted on Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:10:16 -0500 as excerpted: Really, for someone like me, it is just best to avoid irc. FWIW, some 12 years ago now, in 2004, I started using gentoo, with the intent of contributing and potentially eventually becoming a dev.

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

2016-12-07 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 06-12-2016 a las 22:15 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:54:26 -0500 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:13 AM, konsolebox > > wrote: > > > > > > Please consider promoting the use of tinfo flag in packages that > > > depend on sys-libs/ncurses s

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

2016-12-07 Thread konsolebox
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:16:45 +0800 > konsolebox wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:11:34 -0600 >> > William Hubbs wrote: >> > >> >> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:26:19PM -0500, Mike Gilbert

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

2016-12-07 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 12/07/2016 06:07 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> So I just now sent email to : >> proxy-maint+subscr...@gentoo.org You likely want to check out [gentoo-proxy-ma...@lists.gentoo.org] instead of the project alias. The latter is restricted to Gentoo developers. References: [gentoo-proxy-ma...@lis

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

2016-12-07 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:16:45 +0800 konsolebox wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:11:34 -0600 > > William Hubbs wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:26:19PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

2016-12-07 Thread konsolebox
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 20:11:34 -0600 > William Hubbs wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 05:26:19PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:54:26 -0500 >> > > Mike Gilbert

Re: [gentoo-dev] tinfo flag

2016-12-07 Thread konsolebox
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Updating ~1500 ebuilds with a [tinfo=] use-dep seems like a poor solution. If it's the only consistent solution, either you go for it, compromise, or be contented that it's half-broken. I'm not a fan of the latter 2. Or maybe we can /hopeful