On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:15:42 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:33:10PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:41:02 -0600
> > William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > as part of bug 599044 [1], I have created a tmpfiles project which is a
> > > stan
On 11/06/2016 02:52 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> Following my previous RFC wrt version operator problems, I'd like to
> start the second part of the discussion: how to improve version
> operators in a Future EAPI?
>
> I've collected various ideas on operator changes on a wiki page
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:33:10PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:41:02 -0600
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > as part of bug 599044 [1], I have created a tmpfiles project which is a
> > standalone utility to handle systemd style tmpfiles.d files.
> >
> > There is
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:41:02 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> as part of bug 599044 [1], I have created a tmpfiles project which is a
> standalone utility to handle systemd style tmpfiles.d files.
>
> There is currently a live ebuild in the tree, but I haven't done any
> releases yet.
>
>
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 11/08/2016 10:44 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>> On 11/08/2016 05:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Patrick McLean wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:41:02 -
On 11/09/2016 02:42 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> apache2? ( www-servers/apache[apache2_modules_cgi] >= 2.4 ),
>
> In what order is that interpreted? Remember that you aren't allowed to
> reference USE flags not in IUSE without (+) and (-). So if things are
> parsed left-to-right, you ma
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 10:44 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> On 11/08/2016 05:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Patrick McLean wrote:
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:41:02 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
>
> The plan, once
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> >> dev-foo/bar(:* :=) renders :* meaningless since := restricts any
>> >> installed runtime dependency's slot and subslot to be currently
>> >> available. It's still algorithmically corr
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 18:17:25 +0800
konsolebox wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:32:33 +0800
> > konsolebox wrote:
> >> dev-foo/bar:={:1.3= :1.4= :1.5=} OR dev-foo/bar(:= {:1.3= :1.4=
> >> :1.5=}) renders := being an "any" operator meaningless
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:32:33 +0800
> konsolebox wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> >>dev-foo/bar{:1.3 :1.4 :1.5} ## Solves "A. Range dependencies vs
>> >>slotting"
>> >
>> > I'm not sure about this. Slots are k
Hi,
As requested in this PR I submit this patch to gentoo-dev for review /
approval.
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/2746
The commit message:
Currently distutils_install_for_testing does not install the complete
egg-info into ${TEST_DIR}. This was first noticed by W. Trevor King and
repor
11 matches
Mail list logo
