William L. Thomson Jr. posted on Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:48:33 -0400 as
excerpted:
> Its a slippery slope Gentoo is going down. The lack of man power causes
> many things to go un-maintained. I will not comment on tree-cleaning
> being right or wrong. Essentially what is taking place at a high level
>
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:35 AM, David Seifert wrote:
> On Sa, 2016-10-08 at 13:57 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> # Pacho Ramos (08 Oct 2016)
>> # Uses get_libdir at global scope (#593382). Dead for ages. Removal
>> in
>> a
>> # month.
>> app-cdr/nero
>
> I'd like to keep this package, hence fixed
sys-devel/bmake installs catpage in place of a manpage,
which makes sys-apps/man-db add newlines to it.
Either ebuild or man could be patched.
>From fffd911719c854b5411f9d6348da7757b364fad6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mihail Konev
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 05:43:56 +0500
Subject: [PATCH] sys-dev
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2016-10-30 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
app-office/akonadi-server 20161030-12:54 johu e4b6626
dev-python/asyncio20161028-01:04 floppyme334e9c
kde-apps
On 10/30/2016 03:32 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:58:59 -0700
> Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> On 10/30/2016 01:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Hi, everyone.
>>>
>>> Just a quick note: I've prepared a simple tool [1] to verify clones of
>>> gentoo-mirror repositories. It's still early W
I'm merging in Michał's reply from the related "[gentoo-portage-dev]
[PATCH] [sync] Increase the default git sync-depth to 10" thread.
On 10/30/2016 02:58 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/30/2016 01:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Hi, everyone.
>>
>> Just a quick note: I've prepared a simple tool [1] t
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:58:59 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 10/30/2016 01:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hi, everyone.
> >
> > Just a quick note: I've prepared a simple tool [1] to verify clones of
> > gentoo-mirror repositories. It's still early WiP but can be easily used
> > to verify a clone:
>
On 10/30/2016 01:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> Just a quick note: I've prepared a simple tool [1] to verify clones of
> gentoo-mirror repositories. It's still early WiP but can be easily used
> to verify a clone:
>
> $ ./verify-repo gentoo
> [/var/db/repos/gentoo]
> Untrust
Hi, everyone.
Just a quick note: I've prepared a simple tool [1] to verify clones of
gentoo-mirror repositories. It's still early WiP but can be easily used
to verify a clone:
$ ./verify-repo gentoo
[/var/db/repos/gentoo]
Untrusted signature on 42ccdf48d718287e981c00f25caea2242262906a
(yo
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 09:47:36PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 02:54:17 +
> "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
>
> > They may or may not still be referenced
> > by the thick Manifests.
> Surely they should not continue to be referenced, as being referenced
> but not present would
# James Le Cuirot (30 Oct 2016)
# This was renamed by upstream years ago to jnr-ffi, which we have
# long had a package for. Removal in 30 days.
dev-java/jaffl
--
James Le Cuirot (chewi)
Gentoo Linux Developer
pgpHsYVuJ4ady.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 02:54:17 +
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> They may or may not still be referenced
> by the thick Manifests.
Surely they should not continue to be referenced, as being referenced
but not present would cause the entire package to be deemed invalid due
to failing integrity chec
El sáb, 29-10-2016 a las 16:25 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
> On 10/29/2016 02:30 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> >
> > On 10/29/2016 07:59 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/08/2016 07:57 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > >
> > > > # Fails to build (#515294), nothing needs it, relies on
> > >
13 matches
Mail list logo
