Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds

2016-10-16 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:30:44 -0400 "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote: > Part of the idea is to help differentiate the types of binaries in tree to > hopefully get less binaries that are from source. > > To start I just wanted to see about a policy for -bin, the other stuff was > just extra after

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds

2016-10-16 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
On 16/10/16 10:43 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:19:25 PM EDT Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> >> *IF* we were going to make use of upstream vs gentoo-generated binary >> packages in the tree, they *WOULD* block one-another as they would >> collide file-wise at least pa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds

2016-10-16 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Monday, October 17, 2016 4:37:50 AM EDT Duncan wrote: > William L. Thomson Jr. posted on Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:30:44 -0400 as > > excerpted: > > Then how would you test that against non official? You cannot install > > the same package twice at the same time with different USE flags. You > > can'

[gentoo-dev] Re: Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds

2016-10-16 Thread Duncan
William L. Thomson Jr. posted on Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:30:44 -0400 as excerpted: > Then how would you test that against non official? You cannot install > the same package twice at the same time with different USE flags. You > can't even make binaries easily of the same package with different USE >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds

2016-10-16 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Sunday, October 16, 2016 9:19:25 PM EDT Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > *IF* we were going to make use of upstream vs gentoo-generated binary > packages in the tree, they *WOULD* block one-another as they would > collide file-wise at least partially if not completely. So there > wouldn't be any te

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds

2016-10-16 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
On 16/10/16 06:30 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Saturday, October 15, 2016 4:10:51 PM EDT Kent Fredric wrote: >> >> Yeah, I get the intent, but I don't see it being likely we'd ever have >> a real usecase for having both a -bin and a -gbin in tree together. > > You actually came up with o

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-10-16 23:59 UTC

2016-10-16 Thread Robin H. Johnson
:27 soap 0b9f32f sys-process/dumb-init 20161013-02:12 zmedico8d07399 sys-process/tini20161013-01:41 zmedico7390b0c x11-misc/primus 20161016-21:34 zx2c4 5f61c46 x11-misc/xss-lock 20160909-22:54 monsieurp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds

2016-10-16 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Saturday, October 15, 2016 4:10:51 PM EDT Kent Fredric wrote: > > Yeah, I get the intent, but I don't see it being likely we'd ever have > a real usecase for having both a -bin and a -gbin in tree together. You actually came up with one I was not considering at first but provides a direct tech

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds

2016-10-16 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Saturday, October 15, 2016 5:00:07 PM EDT Austin English wrote: > On 10/15/2016 05:32 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > On 10/14/2016 07:17 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > >> On Friday, October 14, 2016 1:09:25 PM EDT Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >>> On 14/10/16 01:05 PM, William L. Thomson

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: games-strategy/freeorion

2016-10-16 Thread Thomas Kahle
Hi, games-strategy/freeorion is a space empire and galactic conquest game inspired by Master of Orion (though not a clone): http://www.freeorion.org I cannot maintain it anymore, the main reason being that I don't have a gentoo machine with a screen attached to it at the moment. FreeOrion has a