On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:31:06 +0200
Marek Szuba wrote:
> On 2016-09-27 22:51, Raymond Jennings wrote:
>
> > Doesn't VIDEO_CARDS factor in on xorg-server's video driver
> > selection?
> It does. Which is why with the way things are now, and which Michał's
> proposal should improve, someone with
On 2016-09-27 22:51, Raymond Jennings wrote:
> Doesn't VIDEO_CARDS factor in on xorg-server's video driver
> selection?
It does. Which is why with the way things are now, and which Michał's
proposal should improve, someone with an amdgpu-compatible card will
still have xf86-video-ati lying around
It does. In effect it determines which xorg-drivers are to be merged. This,
and some other packages with options for specific graphic cards/adapters.
Best regards,
Andy Mender.
On 27 Sep 2016 22:52, "Raymond Jennings" wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> On Mon,
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:24:19 +0200
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > You said that flameeyes raised this about 10 years ago. It has
> > indeed been 10 years!
> >
> > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/caa153de0d23dc264330f5e702f26e58
> >
> > The solution he preferred back then was to split
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 08:18:27 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:42:11 +0300
> > Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> >
> > > Ühel kenal päeval, P, 25.09.2016 kell 23:08, kirjutas Michał Górny:
> > > > I'd like to introduce a new US
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:52:08 +1300
Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:24:19 +0200
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > Also, keep in mind that with an external utility you have far less
> > control on what is executed than with something in $PORTDIR: people
> > may use an older buggy version
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:24:19 +0200
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Also, keep in mind that with an external utility you have far less
> control on what is executed than with something in $PORTDIR: people may
> use an older buggy version of the utility, while when shipping it in
> $PORTDIR you are sure th
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:35:29 +0100
James Le Cuirot wrote:
[...]
> > On the other hand, we could go the complete opposite direction of
> > what has been done in the past years with PMS: provide a generic
> > way to extend ebuild env from profiles, with the ability to
> > "include" some "eclasses",
