Re: [gentoo-dev] chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 08/28/2016 07:28 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: >> B. Backport just the changes needed for chromium to older ffmpeg > > Any chance of it being included upstream or would it be a downstream > carry for a long time? I haven't looked a

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-08-28 23:59 UTC

The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2016-08-28 23:59 UTC. Removals: kde-apps/kde-wallpapers 20160828-16:16 johu2ffcd3a kde-plasma/kactivities-workspace 20160825-20:36 johuecf50a8 Additions: app-vim

Re: [gentoo-dev] chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

On 08/28/2016 07:28 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > See for context. > > chromium-54 is currently hard masked; it'd soon enter ~arch, and then > stable in ~6 weeks. ffmpeg-3.0.1 is currently hard masked. > > These are the options I see for how to pr

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

Ok all, here is what openrc-0.22 is going to do in terms of setting the host name. If /etc/hostname exists, the first word of that file will be used as the host name. Otherwise, if the value is set in /etc/conf.d/hostname it will be used. Otherwise, OpenRC will not touch the hostname. One advant

[gentoo-dev] chromium-54 needs ffmpeg-3.0.1

See for context. chromium-54 is currently hard masked; it'd soon enter ~arch, and then stable in ~6 weeks. ffmpeg-3.0.1 is currently hard masked. These are the options I see for how to proceed. Feel free to share further alternatives. A. Prepare t

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > (and what abuse? it did exactly what it was supposed to do quite nicely, > until it stopped doing that. Now you need to track state and hope you > don't have race conditions ... ) > You were tracking state before; in mtab. It just isn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On 08/28/2016 04:21 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:34:20 +0200 > Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> On 08/28/2016 08:30 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >>> On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > * no benefit put forth so far,

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:34:20 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 08/28/2016 08:30 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > > On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > >> On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >>> * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file that > >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > Then tools forgot to properly update mtab because hurr why u no symlink > to /proc/mounts (oh wait, /proc/self/mounts ) > > So everyone migrated to /etc/mtab as a symlink (even OpenRC, because > everyone does it) > I think containers were

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On 08/28/2016 08:30 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file that >>> systemd uses, which is true but not beneficial as far as I can tell >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On 08/27/2016 11:30 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file that >>> systemd uses, which is true but not beneficial as far as I can tell >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: /etc/hostname on gentoo

On 08/27/2016 11:48 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 23:30:09 -0700 > Daniel Campbell wrote: > >> On 08/24/2016 09:42 AM, Zac Medico wrote: >>> On 08/24/2016 09:33 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: * no benefit put forth so far, other than that it's the same file that sys