On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 03:46:40PM -0500, R0b0t1 wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to make a push to get python3.5 stable in the next few
> > months. There are a couple things that need to happen first.
> >
> > 1. Add python3_5 to PYTHON
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:24:08AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> sys-block/zram-init
I'll take this, i use it on my laptops
-- Jason
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 16:33:15 +1200
Kent Fredric wrote:
> > so it is paused for a licensed
> > download, as necessary, is not a show stopper
>
> The problem is that download requires a Browser with JavaScript
> support, because it requires JavaScript to set a cookie, and that
> cookie activate
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:57:14PM -0500, james wrote:
You should take a look at Blueness' Gentoo Reference stuff
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:RelEng_GRS
https://blogs.gentoo.org/blueness/2015/07/31/the-gentoo-reference-system-suite-a-new-release-engineering-tool/
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 00:26:01 -0500
james wrote:
> so it is paused for a licensed
> download, as necessary, is not a show stopper
The problem is that download requires a Browser with JavaScript
support, because it requires JavaScript to set a cookie, and that
cookie activates the download workin
On 08/07/2016 10:22 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 16:49:01 -0500
james wrote:
After that feat is accomplished, then a similar deployment of a
gentoo cluster on a those just installed gentoo minimal images, via a
few keystrokes (I am flexible on the cluster codes that comprise the
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 16:49:01 -0500
james wrote:
> After that feat is accomplished, then a similar deployment of a
> gentoo cluster on a those just installed gentoo minimal images, via a
> few keystrokes (I am flexible on the cluster codes that comprise the
> cluster). Then (only after those 2 th
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2016-08-07 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
app-admin/mate-system-tools 20160326-00:51 NP-Hardass927c8d1
app-mobilephone/freesmee20160807-17:21 mgorny41fe748
app-office/lotus
On 08/07/2016 03:48 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Java works pretty well on Gentoo, I'm not quite sure what needs to be
fixed ... I mean, apart from our insane idea to "build from source"
which doesn't fit with the existing structures in the java ecosystem
Wow!. Patrick, you are my hero. I have an
Hi,
I spoke with rafaelmartins today, and I have joined him as a
co-maintainer for dev-lang/lua. We use it at the office, so I have an
interest in taking it forward.
My first plan is to find the latest version of Lua and look at the
upstream build system to find out what we are doing that they ar
On 08/07/2016 10:04 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 07/08/2016 19:36, james wrote:
>>> The interesting apps out there are mostly running python, go and
>>> (sometimes) lua. And that's what I observe in my day job -
>>> business/mobile ISP.
>>
>>
>> Look at the job listing on stackoverflow and elsewhe
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to make a push to get python3.5 stable in the next few
> months. There are a couple things that need to happen first.
>
> 1. Add python3_5 to PYTHON_COMPAT for current ~arch packages. A list
> of packages that need to
On 08/07/2016 03:04 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 07/08/2016 19:36, james wrote:
The interesting apps out there are mostly running python, go and
(sometimes) lua. And that's what I observe in my day job -
business/mobile ISP.
Look at the job listing on stackoverflow and elsewhere (java) is very
On 07/08/2016 19:36, james wrote:
>> The interesting apps out there are mostly running python, go and
>> (sometimes) lua. And that's what I observe in my day job -
>> business/mobile ISP.
>
>
> Look at the job listing on stackoverflow and elsewhere (java) is very
> popular when they list several
On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:05:06 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> app-admin/cpulimit
Nice tool, I use it sometimes, so I'll take it.
Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko
pgpO3kRrhnkEw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 08:28:32PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> It will require a lot of documentation updates (wiki, handbook etc) so I
> wonder if you don't need symlinks for the grub2* names for a while even
> so to ensure compatibility for a deprecation period. New users aren't
> expec
On 08/07/2016 11:55 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
Moving this to a higher visibility thread because I don't know how many
people think such an intense discussion is happening in the tail of a
package assignment . :P
Most of my negativity/limitations are more about making sure we define
where we au
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:39:28 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
>
> I feel that new installs don't need multislot since they won't be
> migrating from grub legasy, so I want to turn the multislot flag off
> in the grub2 ebuilds.
>
> Thoughts?
Fine by me. The difference between us and Debian kept catchin
On 08/07/2016 07:39 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I have spoken with floppym about this (he is the primary maintainer of
> grub2), and he told me to go for it if I want to take on the project, so
> I want some thoughts.
>
..
>
> So, again, this would affect new installs, but users can st
On 08/07/2016 12:49 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:47 PM, james wrote:
On 08/07/2016 09:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Sounds great. What's stopping you?
Why Rich, thanks for the triple compliments; is that a vote that the basic
idea(s) have merit, or sarcasm?
I'm just ex
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:47 PM, james wrote:
> On 08/07/2016 09:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>> Sounds great. What's stopping you?
>>
>
> Why Rich, thanks for the triple compliments; is that a vote that the basic
> idea(s) have merit, or sarcasm?
>
I'm just expressing that the typical blocker i
All,
I have spoken with floppym about this (he is the primary maintainer of
grub2), and he told me to go for it if I want to take on the project, so
I want some thoughts.
Currently, grub2 defaults, with the multislot use flag on, to renaming
things away from upstream -- for example, grub2-install
Hi all,
I would like to make a push to get python3.5 stable in the next few
months. There are a couple things that need to happen first.
1. Add python3_5 to PYTHON_COMPAT for current ~arch packages. A list
of packages that need to be tested and marked compatible with
python3.5 is producted daily.
On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 11:44:35 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 7 sierpnia 2016 09:16:17 CEST, Pacho Ramos napisał(a):
> >This packages are now up for grabs:
> >app-arch/lzop
> >dev-libs/check
> >dev-libs/lzo
>
> I'll take those three. LZO fits nicely with my other compression tools, and I
> t
Moving this to a higher visibility thread because I don't know how many
people think such an intense discussion is happening in the tail of a
package assignment . :P
Most of my negativity/limitations are more about making sure we define
where we aught to go.
They're less "Limits", more "guide
On 08/07/2016 11:21 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:24:37 -0500
james wrote:
Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are
teaching and promoting. I agree
with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on
gentoo-proper, but that sort of thing is killing
On 08/07/2016 09:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:24 AM, james wrote:
As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default
disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3
months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly. Not an anything you
On 08/07/2016 09:09 AM, Consus wrote:
On 08:24 Sun 07 Aug, james wrote:
On 08/07/2016 02:38 AM, Consus wrote:
On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote:
Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it
still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime the
few la
On 08/07/2016 09:06 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 07/08/2016 15:32, Kent Fredric wrote:
Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are
teaching and promoting. I agree
with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on gentoo-proper,
but that sort of thing is killing gentoo
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:24:37 -0500
james wrote:
> >> Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are
> >> teaching and promoting. I agree
> >> with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on
> >> gentoo-proper, but that sort of thing is killing gentoo and just
> >> appears
On 08/07/2016 08:32 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 08:24:51 -0500
james wrote:
As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default
disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3
months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly. Not an anything y
On 07/08/16 19:26, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> dev-util/gource
I can take this one.
On 08/08/16 00:37, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El dom, 07-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
>> [...]
>> Well, that's easily remedied with an alias for the project that
>> contains
>> all the subprojects, no?
>>
>
> But I don't know if the projects will like to behave in that way...
> becau
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:24 AM, james wrote:
>
> As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default
> disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3
> months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly. Not an anything you want it to
> be, but a few, common choic
On 8/7/2016 10:06 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I have no idea where James gets his information from, but I suspect it's
a niche market where uni students do "clustering" - whatever that is.
Many of the new frameworks/servers that are developed for running or
managing clusters are written in Java,
El dom, 07-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
> [...]
> Well, that's easily remedied with an alias for the project that
> contains
> all the subprojects, no?
>
But I don't know if the projects will like to behave in that way...
because freedesktop-bugs was behaving exactly in that wa
On 08:24 Sun 07 Aug, james wrote:
> On 08/07/2016 02:38 AM, Consus wrote:
> > On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it
> > > still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime the
> > > few last developers retir
On 07/08/2016 15:32, Kent Fredric wrote:
>> Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are
>> > teaching and promoting. I agree
>> > with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on gentoo-proper,
>> > but that sort of thing is killing gentoo and just appears to the open
>>
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 08:24:51 -0500
james wrote:
>
> As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default
> disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3
> months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly. Not an anything you want
> it to be, but a few, common
On 08/07/2016 06:34 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 10:29 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
>> On 08/06/2016 04:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>>
>>> Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop
>>>
>>> Well, it seems that it's only "containing" other subprojects... but
>>> I
>>> am uns
On 08/07/2016 02:38 AM, Consus wrote:
On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote:
Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it
still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime the
few last developers retired, and users long ago switched to the
comparatively re
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> x11-libs/xosd
I'll proxy this. I'll look over the bugs.
//Peter
El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0700, Raymond Jennings escribió:
> If an empty project has subprojects, I think that violates the
> definition of empty.
>
Empty in the terms of previously having a maintainer taking care of it
and now being "maintainer-needed"... I didn't think I would need to
exp
El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 10:29 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
> On 08/06/2016 04:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop
> >
> > Well, it seems that it's only "containing" other subprojects... but
> > I
> > am unsure if we really need it. Anyway, he is now
El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 17:09 +0300, Andrew Savchenko escribió:
> On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:37:19 + Peter Stuge wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pacho, many thanks for your work, but..
> >
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Pac
Dnia 7 sierpnia 2016 09:16:17 CEST, Pacho Ramos napisał(a):
>This packages are now up for grabs:
>app-arch/lzop
>dev-libs/check
>dev-libs/lzo
I'll take those three. LZO fits nicely with my other compression tools, and I
think check is needed by one of my packages.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
On 08/07/2016 10:12 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> This packages are now up for grabs:
>> app-portage/euscan
>
> Patrick,
>
> Are you still keeping euscan running?
>
Yes. It's not in the best shape, but for now it works well enough to
keep it
This packages are now up for grabs:
app-cdr/uif2iso
app-misc/bgrep
app-text/docbook-xsl-ns-stylesheets
app-text/unpaper
dev-libs/radlib
dev-ruby/ruby-elf
dev-util/google-perftools
dev-util/gource
dev-util/smem
dev-util/vbindiff
media-gfx/esci-interpreter-gt-s80
media-gfx/iscan-plugin-esdip
media-gf
This packages are now up for grabs:
net-p2p/dogecoin-qt
This packages are now up for grabs:
app-portage/g-sorcery
app-portage/gs-elpa
app-portage/gs-pypi
app-shells/rust-zshcomp
app-vim/rust-mode
dev-db/cppdb
dev-db/soci
sys-block/zram-init
Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:LXDE is empty
Feel free to join, anyway, if I don't misremember, LXDE is dead for a
long time in favor of LXQT... in that case treecleaning the packages
would also be an option
Thanks
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> app-portage/euscan
Patrick,
Are you still keeping euscan running?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Deven Lahoti wrote:
> What's the policy on maintaining a package if I'm not (yet, hopefully) an
> official dev? I'd like to take on transmission-remote-gtk since I use it
> fairly often.
That would be great!
I think you want to start by looking at proxy maintenanc
This packages are now up for grabs:
app-admin/cpulimit
net-misc/htpdate
What's the policy on maintaining a package if I'm not (yet, hopefully) an
official dev? I'd like to take on transmission-remote-gtk since I use it
fairly often.
On Aug 7, 2016 03:41, "Pacho Ramos" wrote:
> This packages are now up for grabs:
> app-misc/sl
> app-portage/epkg
> dev-libs/libmcs
> d
This packages are now up for grabs:
app-portage/euscan
This packages are now up for grabs:
app-misc/sl
app-portage/epkg
dev-libs/libmcs
dev-libs/libmowgli-glib
dev-libs/libmowgli
media-sound/guimup
media-video/miro
net-irc/atheme-services
net-irc/charybdis
net-irc/shadowircd
net-irc/unrealircd
net-misc/quickshare
net-p2p/transmission-remote-gtk
x11-plu
On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote:
> Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it
> still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime the
> few last developers retired, and users long ago switched to the
> comparatively recent distribution of Debian stabl
This packages are now up for grabs:
dev-util/ketchup
This packages are now up for grabs:
app-arch/lzop
app-portage/repo-commit
app-text/discount
dev-lang/squirrel
dev-libs/check
dev-libs/liblist
dev-libs/libstrl
dev-libs/lzo
dev-php/securimage
dev-util/bin_replace_string
dev-util/difffilter
dev-util/geany-plugins
dev-vcs/veracity
net-irc/ultimate
sys
This packages are now up for grabs:
dev-util/rpmdevtools
sys-fs/simple-mtpfs
61 matches
Mail list logo
