Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection

2016-07-18 Thread Kent Fredric
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:21:22 -0400 waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > I'm amazed that "robust linux servers" are deathly afraid of simply > setting the time, and being done with it. There's problems at the software level everywhere that are not so simply solved. A more obvious example is in the ev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection

2016-07-18 Thread waltdnes
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:27:09PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote > > As I wrote earlier in this thread, ntp server is not a guarantee > that such problems will not happen. If hardware clocked was > significantly offset during boot, it may take several _hours_ for > ntp to fix this via clock skew.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection

2016-07-18 Thread Bill Kenworthy
On 19/07/16 07:06, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.07.2016 kell 16:25, kirjutas james: >> On 07/18/2016 03:03 PM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: >>> * Rafael Goncalves Martins schrieb am 18.07.16 um 03:12 Uhr: On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Savchenko >>> o.org> wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection

2016-07-18 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 18.07.2016 kell 16:25, kirjutas james: > On 07/18/2016 03:03 PM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > > * Rafael Goncalves Martins schrieb am 18.07.16 um 03:12 Uhr: > > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Savchenko > > o.org> wrote: > > > > Set it for a minute or two. This will p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection

2016-07-18 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 18:03:30 + Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> >> The tolerances are presently set to: >> - 5 seconds of clock drift. > > Set it for a minute or two. This will protect from commits from > really out-of-sync systems (like 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection

2016-07-18 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> Why such tight requirement? Why not a minute, which will not hurt >> git, but will help with system _temporarily_ out-of-sync. >> >> Some hardware clocks are real mess and ca

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection

2016-07-18 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:03:35 +0200 Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > * Rafael Goncalves Martins schrieb am 18.07.16 um 03:12 Uhr: > > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Savchenko > > wrote: > > > Set it for a minute or two. This will protect from commits from > > > really out-of-sync systems (like

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection

2016-07-18 Thread james
On 07/18/2016 03:03 PM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: * Rafael Goncalves Martins schrieb am 18.07.16 um 03:12 Uhr: On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: Set it for a minute or two. This will protect from commits from really out-of-sync systems (like 14 days mentioned above) and w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection

2016-07-18 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Rafael Goncalves Martins schrieb am 18.07.16 um 03:12 Uhr: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > Set it for a minute or two. This will protect from commits from > > really out-of-sync systems (like 14 days mentioned above) and will > > keep usablity hight for others. >