> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> I didn't initially wanted to do the profile either but some
> developers have refused to support this 'unsupported configuration'.
> I assume that having an official profile will ensure better
> cooperation.
IMHO we should create additional profile
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:33:54 -0400
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup
>> > in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system p
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:33:54 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup
> > in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system packages
> > to make it possible to use it without having to ha
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup
> in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system packages
> to make it possible to use it without having to hack their mistaken
> logic around.
The baselayout and glibc chang
Moving away from the lib symlink has been discussed before, and there is
a bug on it that stalled [1].
I am interested in picking up this project again and actually making it
happen.
I am not an expert in how the profiles are set up, so, can someone give
me input on how/where to create the new p
