On 06/30/2016 11:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 23:27:18 -0700
> Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
>> On 06/30/2016 06:02 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
I'm glad to see some reach-out here and taking responsibility for
deci
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 23:27:18 -0700
> Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
>> On 06/30/2016 06:02 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> >> I'm glad to see some reach-out here and taking responsibility for
>
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 23:27:18 -0700
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 06/30/2016 06:02 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> >> I'm glad to see some reach-out here and taking responsibility for
> >> decisions. However, what does the QA team have to say a
On 06/30/2016 06:02 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> I'm glad to see some reach-out here and taking responsibility for
>> decisions. However, what does the QA team have to say about systems that
>> want games on other media (such as an SSD or sepa
# Hans de Graaff (1 Jul 2016)
# With the release of Rails 5.0 versions older than 4.2 are no longer
# supported. Mask Rails 3.2 and related packages for removal in 30
days.
dev-ruby/rails:3.2
dev-ruby/railties:3.2
dev-ruby/activerecord:3.2
dev-ruby/actionmailer:3.2
dev-ruby/actionpack:3.2
dev-ruby
Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 30 Jun 2016 20:24:43 -0400 as excerpted:
> In this case I can assure you that people were frustrated that it took
> as long as it did to end up with a decision, and it largely was because
> we recognized the controversy. There were multiple rounds of meetings
> and num
I'm going to ask the security team to please stop running around
p.masking packages without acknowledgement from the maintainers. I'm
referring in particular to commit
135b94c85950254f559f290f4865bce8b349a917 regarding monkeyd. Both of the
cited "security bugs" were long fixed, and even if the we
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:38:26 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> So if you have some time, please reply to this thread with
> a specific /boot layout that you think needs to be handled, with
> as much helpful information as possible -- including possible
> distinctive features and pitfalls.
>
All of our
Michał Górny posted on Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:38:26 +0200 as excerpted:
> [P]lease reply to this thread with
> a specific /boot layout that you think needs to be handled, with as much
> helpful information as possible -- including possible distinctive
> features and pitfalls.
This is surely more inf
# Aaron Bauman (1 Jul 2016)
# Unpatched security vulnerabilities and dead upstream
# per bugs #459274 and #473770 Removal in 30 days
www-servers/monkeyd
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> I'm glad to see some reach-out here and taking responsibility for
> decisions. However, what does the QA team have to say about systems that
> want games on other media (such as an SSD or separate HDD), or wish to
> restrict the use of game
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> Our ebuilds are maintained by developers, with the occasional
> proxy-maintainer or contributor. Your previous statement combined with
> this amounts to "QA owns and manages the Gentoo repository." You just
> said teams have no autonomy ove
On 06/30/2016 08:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> Back in 2011 I started a project called eclean-kernel. The idea was
> pretty simple -- to have a tool that would clean the old kernels for
> me since their install is not controlled by the package manager. This
> little project of
On 06/30/2016 06:17 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:54:44 -0700
> Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
>> That's what I think this drama is about; changes being pushed from
>> people who don't work on games, then leaving these game maintainers (and
>> users) in the dark without a "correct" w
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Campbell (zlg)
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> 'boot' is a symlink to '.'. Not really sure why it's there but if I remove
> it, things break. Probably a minor misconfiguration.
>
/boot/boot -> /boot allows you to prefix every
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On June 30, 2016 6:19:23 AM PDT, "Michał Górny" wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:55:42 -0700
>Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
>> On 06/30/2016 05:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > Hello, everyone.
>> >
>> > Back in 2011 I started a project called eclean-kerne
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> So if you have some time, please reply to this thread with
> a specific /boot layout that you think needs to be handled, with
> as much helpful information as possible -- including possible
> distinctive features and pitfalls.
Standard "make
* Michał Górny schrieb am 30.06.16 um 15:19 Uhr:
> > My /boot/:
> >
> > grub
> > lost+found
> > backup -> linux-4.4.1-gentoo-2
> > boot
>
> What's 'boot' here? Is that relevant?
This might be a symlink to '.' which I too have on many systems. You
need it, so grub can find files that start with
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> So if you have some time, please reply to this thread with
> a specific /boot layout that you think needs to be handled, with
> as much helpful information as possible -- including possible
> distinctive features and pitfalls.
/boot on remova
As someone using eclean-kernel somewhat regularly, I figured I should
mention what running `make all modules_install install` in the kernel
source looks like:
$ ls -F1 /boot
config-4.6.0-gentoo
config-4.6.1-gentoo
config-4.6.2-gentoo
config-4.6.3-gentoo
efi/
grub/
initramfs-4.6.0-gentoo.img
initra
# Aaron Bauman (30 Jun 2016)
# Unpatched security vulnerability per bug #509920.
# Removal in 30 days
www-apps/egroupware
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:55:42 -0700
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 06/30/2016 05:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > Back in 2011 I started a project called eclean-kernel. The idea was
> > pretty simple -- to have a tool that would clean the old kernels for
> > me since their ins
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:54:44 -0700
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> That's what I think this drama is about; changes being pushed from
> people who don't work on games, then leaving these game maintainers (and
> users) in the dark without a "correct" way to achieve what they're
> after. We can do better
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 22:37:27 -0700
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 10:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:47:43 -0700
> > Daniel Campbell wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/29/2016 10:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>> Hello, everyone.
> >>>
> >>> Over half a year has passed since
On 06/30/2016 05:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> Back in 2011 I started a project called eclean-kernel. The idea was
> pretty simple -- to have a tool that would clean the old kernels for
> me since their install is not controlled by the package manager. This
> little project of
Hello, everyone.
Back in 2011 I started a project called eclean-kernel. The idea was
pretty simple -- to have a tool that would clean the old kernels for
me since their install is not controlled by the package manager. This
little project of mine seems to have gained a lot of popularity.
Sadly, o
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
> Do teams hold any authority (or veto power, whatever you want to call
> it) over their own ebuilds? Is it reasonable to rip functionality out
> from under a group of developers and tell them to deal with it?
Generally speaking, yes. If
# Johannes Huber (30 Jun 2016)
# Andreas K. Huettel (22 Mar 2012)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Dead upstream. Superseded
# by oxygen-gtk long time ago.
#
# (Original mask: Even its author admits that it's an ugly
# hack. Crashes e.g. firefox with kde-4.8. Unmask at your own
# risk.)
kde-misc/
On 06/29/2016 10:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:47:43 -0700
> Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
>> On 06/29/2016 10:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Hello, everyone.
>>>
>>> Over half a year has passed since Council decided upon the fate of
>>> games in Gentoo. Over that period, the gam
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:47:43 -0700
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 10:11 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > Over half a year has passed since Council decided upon the fate of
> > games in Gentoo. Over that period, the games team has neither showed
> > any will to respect
On 06/29/2016 04:02 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> I'm glad to see some reach-out here and taking responsibility for
>> decisions. However, what does the QA team have to say about systems that
>> want games on other media (such as an SSD or sep
31 matches
Mail list logo
