On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:09:39 +0800
> konsolebox wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:53 PM, james wrote:
>> > The grandiose-ness you propose should only come upon graduating from proxy
>> > school, imho.
>> > user-->strong-users-->proxy-->
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2016, Benda Xu wrote:
> I have added EPREFIX logics for EAPI<3 and improved the trailing
> slashes and quotes.
> - [[ -f ${ROOT}/usr/include/linux/autoconf.h ]] \
> + [[ -f "${EROOT}"usr/include/linux/autoconf.h ]] \
Inside [[ ]] quotes are generally
On 12/06/16 04:53, james wrote:
>
> So I read this bug, but it did not illuminate an active archive, but the
> requests and subsequent problems encountered, or did i miss it? It
> looks like the kinks are being worked out. PM having a ML is a great
> idea.
>
>
> Interesting. I found the ML @ game:
On 06/12/2016 04:57 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 06/12/2016 05:53 AM, james wrote:
>
>> I only see (2) posts in the ML, so is it active?
>
> It is a new ML, but it is active to the extent that you should expect to
> see discussion on it
>
To elaborate on this, there were posts on it
On 06/12/2016 05:53 AM, james wrote:
> On 06/11/2016 08:29 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 06/12/2016 04:20 AM, james wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there an archive to this wonderful list? I cannot seem to find the
>>> archive?
>>
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581370
>>
>
> So I read this
Thanks Zac, Göktürk,
I have added EPREFIX logics for EAPI<3 and improved the trailing slashes
and quotes.
Benda
--- kernel-2.eclass 2016-02-17 22:46:25.235543840 +0900
+++ kernel-2.eclass 2016-06-12 11:48:19.843801138 +0900
@@ -105,6 +105,8 @@
HOMEPAGE="https://www.kernel.org/ https://w
On 06/11/2016 08:29 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 06/12/2016 04:20 AM, james wrote:
Is there an archive to this wonderful list? I cannot seem to find the
archive?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581370
So I read this bug, but it did not illuminate an active archive, but the
r
On 06/11/2016 05:52 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:58:35PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote
On 06/11/2016 10:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote:
[snip]
Good/Bad idea, posting proxy-maintainer questions to gentoo-user?
(recall irc d
On 06/12/2016 04:20 AM, james wrote:
>
> Is there an archive to this wonderful list? I cannot seem to find the
> archive?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581370
--
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F
Benda Xu:
> Hi Fellows,
>
> This is a trivial patch for kernel-2.eclass to support Prefix. Does it
> look good to be commited?
>
> Thanks,
> Benda
>
> Bug: 478436
> --- kernel-2.eclass 2016-02-17 22:46:25.235543840 +0900
> +++ kernel-2.eclass 2016-05-24 01:14:22.246809021 +0900
> @@ -539,8
On 06/11/2016 03:59 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 06/11/2016 01:58 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
On 06/11/2016 10:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote:
There is also a gentoo-proxy-ma...@lists.gentoo.org list for these kinds
of questions that is likely more ap
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:58:35PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote
> On 06/11/2016 10:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> > On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> Good/Bad idea, posting proxy-maintainer questions to gentoo-user?
> >> (recall irc does not work for me). Also, it mi
Am 11.06.2016 um 21:41 schrieb Matthias Schwarzott:
> Am 05.06.2016 um 21:04 schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
>> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Patrice Clement wrote:
>>> dev-util/cdecl
>>> dev-util/dwarves
>>> dev-util/intel2gas
>>> dev-util/lsuio
>>> dev-util/mock
>>> dev-util/par
>>> dev-uti
On 06/11/2016 01:58 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 06/11/2016 10:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>> Good/Bad idea, posting proxy-maintainer questions to gentoo-user?
>>> (recall irc does not work for me). Also, it might just spur on other
On 06/11/2016 10:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> Good/Bad idea, posting proxy-maintainer questions to gentoo-user?
>> (recall irc does not work for me). Also, it might just spur on other
>> users to create/maintain a few packages in their own are
On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Good/Bad idea, posting proxy-maintainer questions to gentoo-user?
> (recall irc does not work for me). Also, it might just spur on other
> users to create/maintain a few packages in their own area of interest.
Anyone is welcome to post to either g
El sáb, 11-06-2016 a las 22:48 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El jue, 02-06-2016 a las 10:42 -0500, james escribió:
> >
> > On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote:
> > > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these
> > packages
> > > anymore, they are all up for grabs.
> >
El jue, 02-06-2016 a las 10:42 -0500, james escribió:
> On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote:
> > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these
> packages
> > anymore, they are all up for grabs.
> >
> > - media-gfx/openmesh [no project]
> > - sys-cluster/gangli
On 06/11/2016 06:18 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I also fail to see what is wrong with suggesting the items for
>> the agenda... is not that the purpose of this call? Or maybe I am
>> missing some replies to the thread :|
>>
>
> I'm not
This packages are now up for grabs:
app-admin/ccze
app-crypt/ckpass
app-mobilephone/sobexsrv
dev-libs/libkpass
media-gfx/qrencode
sys-apps/razercfg
x11-misc/xdotool
Am 05.06.2016 um 21:04 schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Patrice Clement wrote:
>> dev-util/cdecl
>> dev-util/dwarves
>> dev-util/intel2gas
>> dev-util/lsuio
>> dev-util/mock
>> dev-util/par
>> dev-util/tinlink
>> dev-util/usb-robot
> I've used the above subset o
On 06/11/2016 08:02 AM, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi Fellows,
>
> This is a trivial patch for kernel-2.eclass to support Prefix. Does it
> look good to be commited?
The EPREFIX and EROOT variables are undefined prior to EAPI 3, so the
eclass should die if the EAPI is 0, 1, or 2.
--
Thanks,
Zac
Hi Fellows,
This is a trivial patch for kernel-2.eclass to support Prefix. Does it
look good to be commited?
Thanks,
Benda
Bug: 478436
--- kernel-2.eclass 2016-02-17 22:46:25.235543840 +0900
+++ kernel-2.eclass 2016-05-24 01:14:22.246809021 +0900
@@ -539,8 +522,8 @@
#==
On 06/10/2016 10:09 PM, konsolebox wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:53 PM, james wrote:
The grandiose-ness you propose should only come upon graduating from proxy
school, imho.
user-->strong-users-->proxy-->dev pathway.
Pedantic, bureaucratic, procedure-oriented, monolithic, restrictive.
Too
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> Yeah, I also fail to see what is wrong with suggesting the items for
> the agenda... is not that the purpose of this call? Or maybe I am
> missing some replies to the thread :|
>
I'm not entirely sure I've caught everything going on based on
El sáb, 11-06-2016 a las 03:35 -0700, Daniel Campbell escribió:
> On 06/10/2016 02:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Considering the strength of response from a Council member, I would
> > like to officially apologize for providing the agenda items and I
> > would
> > like to with
On 06/10/2016 09:05 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 04:20:06PM +0100, M. J. Everitt wrote:
>> (2) any user can edit wiki pages not governed by Projects. Even Project
>> pages I'm sure could be updated by means of patches submitted to the
>> appropriate team, with some basic fo
On 06/10/2016 02:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Considering the strength of response from a Council member, I would
> like to officially apologize for providing the agenda items and I would
> like to withdraw them all appropriately. Thank you for your time, and I
> wish you re-election.
>
Presently, the way to make contributions as outlined in [1] is to create
a bugzilla ticket and attach the patch to that ticket. But there is no
community involvement really for this.
A possible model for increasing user-collaboration and promoting user activity:
>From User's POV:
- Do emerge --
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:09:39 +0800
konsolebox wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:53 PM, james wrote:
> > The grandiose-ness you propose should only come upon graduating from proxy
> > school, imho.
> > user-->strong-users-->proxy-->dev pathway.
>
> Pedantic, bureaucratic, procedure-oriented,
30 matches
Mail list logo
