On Thu, 5 May 2016 19:16:56 -0400
Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Göktürk Yüksek
> ---
> metadata.xsd | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/metadata.xsd b/metadata.xsd
> index 8bc6a4e..fe2c5d2 100644
> --- a/metadata.xsd
> +++ b/metadata.xsd
> @@ -137
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 01:14:22AM +0200, M.B. wrote:
> Good evening folks,
>
> in the past I witnessed bits and pieces of attempts to increase the
> infrastructure userside, but, unless I'm mistaken, there's still room
> for improvement.
>
> Since a couple of years we have the webrsync-gpg FEATU
Signed-off-by: Göktürk Yüksek
---
metadata.xsd | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/metadata.xsd b/metadata.xsd
index 8bc6a4e..fe2c5d2 100644
--- a/metadata.xsd
+++ b/metadata.xsd
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@
+
Good evening folks,
in the past I witnessed bits and pieces of attempts to increase the
infrastructure userside, but, unless I'm mistaken, there's still room
for improvement.
Since a couple of years we have the webrsync-gpg FEATURE, which enables
automatic verification of the portage tree, when u
On 02/05/2016 12:57 am, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 02/05/16 00:53, Brian Dolbec wrote:
>> In order to further improve the chances of Q/A tools catching
>> errors. I have created a new repo (overlay) which will contain minimal
>> test case ebuilds. The idea is to have test case ebuilds to run
>> re
# Michael Palimaka (05 May 2016)
# Doesn't compile against latest media-libs/spandsp.
# Not needed anymore for Asterisk 1.6.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #575778.
net-misc/asterisk-spandsp_codec_g726
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016, 21:40:00 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
> > So how many custom init scripts have you deployed that you can't fix
> > with a
> > single Rex command?
>
> I like the naive assumption that I only have one central deployment :)
>
>
On 05/05/2016 08:59 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016, 09:53:10 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
> > On 05/05/2016 09:44 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> >> On 05/05/16 08:32, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> >>> To summarize: Lots of churn, no visible benefit, except that some OCD
> >>> people coul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2016, 09:53:10 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
> On 05/05/2016 09:44 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> > On 05/05/16 08:32, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> >> To summarize: Lots of churn, no visible benefit, except that some OCD
> >> people could feel b
I've made some progress!
In my command line, I was still using the -k argument: ROOT=/sysroot emerge
-avk sys-power/nut
It seems like the eclass is inside the binary package and thus ignoring the
system eclass. (which make sense to me)
Now I can test my modifications and propose something ;)
th
Patrick Lauer posted on Thu, 05 May 2016 09:32:01 +0200 as excerpted:
> So you're saying that a Gentoo-specific change in Gentoo happens because
> the Gentoo maintainer doesn't care about Gentoo? ;)
I'm saying that big-picture, there's more than one distro, and once a
particular package graduate
On 05/04/2016 04:12 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 07:41:39PM +1000, Sam Jorna wrote:
>> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:57:44AM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>> On 05/04/2016 10:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:00:05AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
On 05/05/16 08:53, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> This ignores the externalized cost for potentially thousands of users
> that have to fix stuff because it was actively broken.
>
To quote an old proverb .. "you can't make an omelette without breaking
eggs" .. if you wish me to explain, I'll do it private
On 05/05/2016 09:44 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 05/05/16 08:32, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> To summarize: Lots of churn, no visible benefit, except that some OCD
>> people could feel better: except that we can't actually fix the core
>> 'issue' without making lots of other people very sad.
>>
>>
>> Y
On 05/05/16 08:32, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> To summarize: Lots of churn, no visible benefit, except that some OCD
> people could feel better: except that we can't actually fix the core
> 'issue' without making lots of other people very sad.
>
>
> Y'all have too much free time ... ;)
>
I'm inclined to
On 05/05/2016 09:17 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Patrick Lauer posted on Thu, 05 May 2016 07:13:00 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> So again, because I feel like either I'm too stupid to understand this,
>> or too smart to let such an obviously bad idea continue:
>>
>> What problem is being solved here?
> For one t
On 05/05/16 08:17, Duncan wrote:
> Patrick Lauer posted on Thu, 05 May 2016 07:13:00 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> So again, because I feel like either I'm too stupid to understand this,
>> or too smart to let such an obviously bad idea continue:
>>
>> What problem is being solved here?
> For one thing,
Patrick Lauer posted on Thu, 05 May 2016 07:13:00 +0200 as excerpted:
> So again, because I feel like either I'm too stupid to understand this,
> or too smart to let such an obviously bad idea continue:
>
> What problem is being solved here?
For one thing, the namespace issue of runscript being
18 matches
Mail list logo
