> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> Isn't this almost obsolete? it's now xmlschema...
Why would that make the DTD obsolete?
The DTD can be used as input format for conversion to other formats
(like RNG or RNC). XML schema is pretty much useless in this respect,
since there seem to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Brian Dolbec:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:39:05 -0400 Göktürk Yüksek
> wrote:
>
>> --- metadata.dtd | 5 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4
>> deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/metadata.dtd b/metadata.dtd index 7626a57..b608852
>> 100644 --- a/meta
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:39:05 -0400
Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
> ---
> metadata.dtd | 5 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/metadata.dtd b/metadata.dtd
> index 7626a57..b608852 100644
> --- a/metadata.dtd
> +++ b/metadata.dtd
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>
>
>
> - ( (m
---
metadata.dtd | 5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/metadata.dtd b/metadata.dtd
index 7626a57..b608852 100644
--- a/metadata.dtd
+++ b/metadata.dtd
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
-
+
@@ -13,9 +13,6 @@
explicit type) for Gentoo maintainers is prohibited. -->
There is a bootstrap tarball for ppc64le now, and we have bi-arch
support for ppc64 platform. It's means that we can build go-1.6.2
without gccgo
Signed-off-by: Leno Hou
---
dev-lang/go/go-1.6.2.ebuild | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/dev-lang/go/go-1.6.2.ebuild b
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Leno Hou wrote:
> There is a bootstrap tarball for ppc64le now, and we have bi-arch
> support for ppc64 platform. It's means that we can build go-1.6.2
> without gccgo
>
> Signed-off-by: Leno Hou
> ---
> dev-lang/go/go-1.6.2.ebuild | 5 +
> 1 file changed, 5
There is a bootstrap tarball for ppc64le now, and we have bi-arch
support for ppc64 platform. It's means that we can build go-1.6.2
without gccgo
Signed-off-by: Leno Hou
---
dev-lang/go/go-1.6.2.ebuild | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/dev-lang/go/go-1.6.2.ebuild b/dev-la
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 05:59:14 +
> Leno Hou wrote:
>
> > There is a bootstrap tarball for ppc64le now, and we have bi-arch
> > support for ppc64 platform. It's means that we can build go-1.6.2
> > without gccgo.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Len
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 05:59:14 +
Leno Hou wrote:
> There is a bootstrap tarball for ppc64le now, and we have bi-arch
> support for ppc64 platform. It's means that we can build go-1.6.2
> without gccgo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leno Hou
> CC: William Hubbs
> ---
> dev-lang/go/go-1.6.2.ebuild | 1
