On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:04:47 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2016 6:28 PM, "Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> > yeah we need to buy him a drink or something really. i'd say make him a
> > dev but i'm not sure i'd inflict that punishment on anyone :P
>
> +1 make him a dev.
+1 here
Best rega
Ühel kenal päeval, N, 21.04.2016 kell 15:42, kirjutas Ian Stakenvicius:
> b) -1 for making it global right now pending resolution of logistics
> for the profiles/base/use.mask entry,
I don't think it's unprecedented to just globally use.mask a USE flag
even if it's not declared a global USE flag.
# Michael Palimaka (21 Apr 2016)
# Requires package no longer in the tree to be useful. Unmaintained.
# Dead upstream. Masked for removal in 30 days.
app-misc/tablix
On 21/04/16 11:31 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, K, 20.04.2016 kell 22:18, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp:
>> Basically the only real point I have is that anything kernel_* to
>> control this probably doesn't make sense.
>>
>
> Oh, just to clarify and avoid misunderstanding:
> I did not int
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 20.04.2016 kell 22:18, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp:
> Basically the only real point I have is that anything kernel_* to
> control this probably doesn't make sense.
>
Oh, just to clarify and avoid misunderstanding:
I did not intend to ack the changes to gdk-pixbuf and gtk+ with my
On 04/20/2016 09:01 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 4/20/16 2:17 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On 20 Apr 2016 21:01, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>>> On 20 April 2016 at 18:52, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Comments?
>>>
>>> You should be able to achieve similar behavior by looking at libc
>>> and/or C
